R. v. Neudorf (T.J.), (2004) 200 B.C.A.C. 274 (CA)
Judge | Rowles, Hall and Levine, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Case Date | June 25, 2004 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274 (CA);2004 BCCA 374 |
R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274 (CA);
327 W.A.C. 274
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.A.C. TBEd. JL.031
Regina (respondent) v. Tyler James Neudorf (appellant)
(CA031330; 2004 BCCA 374)
Indexed As: R. v. Neudorf (T.J.)
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Rowles, Hall and Levine, JJ.A.
June 25, 2004.
Summary:
The accused pleaded guilty to manslaughter. The sentencing judge sentenced him to seven years' imprisonment after crediting him for 18 months in pre-trial custody. The accused appealed his sentence.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and reduced the sentence to six years' imprisonment.
Criminal Law - Topic 5848.2
Sentencing - Considerations - Time already served - The accused (then aged 20) strangled his common law partner (Faulkner) to the point of unconsciousness, with loss of the gag reflex - The accused went to sleep - He subsequently saw Faulkner slumped on her side, but did not check on her or summon assistance - At some point, Faulkner aspirated stomach contents which obstructed her airway and caused her death - The accused placed Faulkner's body and some of her belongings in a creek and diverted suspicion from himself - He pleaded guilty to manslaughter - He had no criminal record - To denounce the accused's post-offence conduct, the sentencing judge refused to give the accused additional credit for 18 months of pre-trial custody - The sentencing judge sentenced the accused to seven years' imprisonment - The British Columbia Court of Appeal held that denunciation of post-offence conduct was an irrelevant factor in determining the appropriate credit for pre-trial custody - The appropriate credit was 30 months, which reflected the fact that the accused took some programs while in pre-trial custody - The court reduced the sentence to six years' imprisonment.
Criminal Law - Topic 5882
Sentence - Manslaughter - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5848.2 ].
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Archibald (R.J.) (1992), 15 B.C.A.C. 301; 27 W.A.C. 301 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Klassen (R.J.), [1997] Y.J. No. 4 (S.C.), affd. (1997), 95 B.C.A.C. 136; 154 W.A.C. 136 (Yuk. C.A.), leave to appeal refused (1997), 225 N.R. 240; 109 B.C.A.C. 160; 177 W.A.C. 160 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Williams (G.M.) (1995), 61 B.C.A.C. 6; 100 W.A.C. 6 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Stone (B.T.), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290; 239 N.R. 201; 123 B.C.A.C. 1; 201 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. McCulloch (D.I.) (2001), 153 B.C.A.C. 32; 251 W.A.C. 32; 2001 BCCA 196, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Wildeman (G.A.) (2002), 173 B.C.A.C. 214; 283 W.A.C. 214; 2002 BCCA 112, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Mintert (R.) (1995), 57 B.C.A.C. 232; 94 W.A.C. 232 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Bathe (C.J.) (2000), 145 B.C.A.C. 291; 237 W.A.C. 291; 2000 BCCA 559, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Green (O.R.) (2001), 160 B.C.A.C. 121; 261 W.A.C. 121; 2001 BCCA 672, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Ellsworth (M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1315; 2003 BCSC 1315, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Cairns (R.S.) (2004), 197 B.C.A.C. 252; 323 W.A.C. 252; 2004 BCCA 219, refd to. [para. 34].
R. v. Mills (D.J.) (1999), 119 B.C.A.C. 284; 194 W.A.C. 284; 133 C.C.C.(3d) 451; 1999 BCCA 159, refd to. [para. 39].
R. v. Rezaie (M.) (1996), 96 O.A.C. 268; 31 O.R.(3d) 713; 112 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40].
R. v. Wust (L.W.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455; 252 N.R. 332; 134 B.C.A.C. 236; 219 W.A.C. 236; 2000 SCC 18, refd to. [para. 40].
Counsel:
R.J. Browning, for the appellant;
W.J.S. Bell, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, before Rowles, Hall and Levine, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. Rowles, J.A., delivered the following oral reasons for judgment on June 25, 2004.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Table of cases
...233–34 R. v. J.E.C. (2004), 187 C.C.C. (3d) 190, 200 B.C.A.C. 274, [2004] B.C.J. No. 1341 (S.C.) ....................................................................... 579 R. v. J.F., 2011 ONCA 220 ........................................................................... 506, 508 R. v. J......
-
R. v. Stewart (D.G.), 2016 NSCA 12
...NSSC 347, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. R.C.C. (1993), 141 A.R. 161; 46 W.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Calder Berg (S.L.) (2007), 243 B.C.A.C. 179; 401 W.A.C. 179; 2007 BCCA 343, r......
-
R. v. Sabourin (E.G.), (2009) 460 A.R. 118 (NWTCA)
...R. v. Orr (C.) (2008), 251 B.C.A.C. 303; 420 W.A.C. 303; 228 C.C.C.(3d) 432; 2008 BCCA 76, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 187 C.C.C.(3d) 190; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Roulette (P.) (2005), 201 Man.R.(2d) 148; 366 W.A.C. 1......
-
R. v. Orr,
...2000 SCC 18, reving. (1998), 107 B.C.A.C. 130; 174 W.A.C. 130; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 43 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 187 C.C.C.(3d) 190; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. R.M.S. (2007), 247 B.C.A.C. 148; 409 W.A.C. 148; 2007 BCC......
-
R. v. Stewart (D.G.), 2016 NSCA 12
...NSSC 347, refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. R.C.C. (1993), 141 A.R. 161; 46 W.A.C. 161 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Calder Berg (S.L.) (2007), 243 B.C.A.C. 179; 401 W.A.C. 179; 2007 BCCA 343, r......
-
R. v. Sabourin (E.G.), (2009) 460 A.R. 118 (NWTCA)
...R. v. Orr (C.) (2008), 251 B.C.A.C. 303; 420 W.A.C. 303; 228 C.C.C.(3d) 432; 2008 BCCA 76, refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 187 C.C.C.(3d) 190; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 13]. R. v. Roulette (P.) (2005), 201 Man.R.(2d) 148; 366 W.A.C. 1......
-
R. v. Orr,
...2000 SCC 18, reving. (1998), 107 B.C.A.C. 130; 174 W.A.C. 130; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 43 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Neudorf (T.J.) (2004), 200 B.C.A.C. 274; 327 W.A.C. 274; 187 C.C.C.(3d) 190; 2004 BCCA 374, refd to. [para. 11]. R. v. R.M.S. (2007), 247 B.C.A.C. 148; 409 W.A.C. 148; 2007 BCC......
-
R. v. Whitman (R.R.), [2006] B.C.T.C. 865 (SC)
...in post-sentence custody. The latter element is absent in this case. [54] Similarly in R. v. Neudorf (2004), 187 C.C.C. (3d) 190, 2004 BCCA 374, the court held that where there was evidence that the accused was able to take rehabilitative programs while in pre-trial custody double credit do......
-
Table of cases
...233–34 R. v. J.E.C. (2004), 187 C.C.C. (3d) 190, 200 B.C.A.C. 274, [2004] B.C.J. No. 1341 (S.C.) ....................................................................... 579 R. v. J.F., 2011 ONCA 220 ........................................................................... 506, 508 R. v. J......