R. v. Norris,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Fairburn A.C.J.O. |
| Neutral Citation | 2020 ONCA 847 |
| Date | 31 December 2020 |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 847 |
| Docket Number | C65226 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Atwima,
...the application to admit similar act evidence relates to the cross-count use of evidence already elicited at trial: see R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, 398 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at para. 24; R. v. J.M., 2010 ONCA 117, 251 C.C.C. (3d) 325, at para. 87. [39] &#......
-
R. v. P.B.,
...any probative value. In making this submission, the defence points to R. v. Lo, 2020 ONCA 622, 152 O.R. (3d) 609; R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, [2020] O.J. No. 5747; and R. v. T.C., 2019 ONCA 898, [2019] O.J. No. 5741. However, these are all cases with multiple complainants where......
-
R. v. J.C.,
...coincidence that more than one person (acting independently) would coincidentally give the same type of evidence”: R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, at para. 17, referring to R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, at para. 48; Handy, at paras. 76, 110; and R. v. Durant, 2019 ......
-
R v Jackman,
...was a striking similarity between the two arsons: R. v. Carpenter (1982), 1 C.C.C. (3d) 149 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 18 and R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, 398 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at paras. 21 We are not convinced that identity was completely off-the-table at the end of trial. In his final instruction......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Atwima,
...the application to admit similar act evidence relates to the cross-count use of evidence already elicited at trial: see R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, 398 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at para. 24; R. v. J.M., 2010 ONCA 117, 251 C.C.C. (3d) 325, at para. 87. [39] &#......
-
R. v. P.B.,
...any probative value. In making this submission, the defence points to R. v. Lo, 2020 ONCA 622, 152 O.R. (3d) 609; R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, [2020] O.J. No. 5747; and R. v. T.C., 2019 ONCA 898, [2019] O.J. No. 5741. However, these are all cases with multiple complainants where......
-
R. v. J.C.,
...coincidence that more than one person (acting independently) would coincidentally give the same type of evidence”: R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, at para. 17, referring to R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, at para. 48; Handy, at paras. 76, 110; and R. v. Durant, 2019 ......
-
R v Jackman,
...was a striking similarity between the two arsons: R. v. Carpenter (1982), 1 C.C.C. (3d) 149 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 18 and R. v. Norris, 2020 ONCA 847, 398 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at paras. 21 We are not convinced that identity was completely off-the-table at the end of trial. In his final instruction......
Request a trial to view additional results