R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6

JurisdictionNunavut
JudgeCharlesworth
Date23 April 2019
CourtNunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
Docket Number09-17-17-II
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...was grossly disproportionate and imposed a sentence of four years. [58]        In R v Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, the Nunavut Court of Justice held the mandatory minimum violated section 12 of the Charter. The offender pleaded guilty to intentionally dischar......
  • R. v. Alphonse,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2020
    ...a number of decisions from the Nunavut and Northwest Territories courts where the provision was found to violate s. 12: R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6; R. v. Ookowt, 2017 NUCJ 22; R. v. Itturiligaq, 2018 NUCJ 31; and R. v. Cardinal, 2018 NWTSC 31. [159] The Crown also fairly notes other dec......
  • R v Dingwall,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...2017 ONCJ 297; R. v. Reis, 2017 ONSC 1961) as well as striking them down ( R. v. Valade, 2019 ONSC 3033). 76 In R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, a trial court held that the mandatory minimum in the former s. 244.2(3)(b) infringed s. 12 based on a reasonable hypothetical. However, the former ......
  • R. v. Dingwall,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...ONSC 1961) as well as striking them down (R. v. Valade, 2019 ONSC 3033). [76]       In R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, a trial court held that the mandatory minimum in the former s. 244.2(3)(b) infringed s. 12 based on a reasonable hypothetical. Howev......
4 cases
  • R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...was grossly disproportionate and imposed a sentence of four years. [58]        In R v Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, the Nunavut Court of Justice held the mandatory minimum violated section 12 of the Charter. The offender pleaded guilty to intentionally dischar......
  • R. v. Alphonse,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 27, 2020
    ...a number of decisions from the Nunavut and Northwest Territories courts where the provision was found to violate s. 12: R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6; R. v. Ookowt, 2017 NUCJ 22; R. v. Itturiligaq, 2018 NUCJ 31; and R. v. Cardinal, 2018 NWTSC 31. [159] The Crown also fairly notes other dec......
  • R v Dingwall,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...2017 ONCJ 297; R. v. Reis, 2017 ONSC 1961) as well as striking them down ( R. v. Valade, 2019 ONSC 3033). 76 In R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, a trial court held that the mandatory minimum in the former s. 244.2(3)(b) infringed s. 12 based on a reasonable hypothetical. However, the former ......
  • R. v. Dingwall,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...ONSC 1961) as well as striking them down (R. v. Valade, 2019 ONSC 3033). [76]       In R. v. Nungusuituq, 2019 NUCJ 6, a trial court held that the mandatory minimum in the former s. 244.2(3)(b) infringed s. 12 based on a reasonable hypothetical. Howev......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT