R. v. Okash (A.), [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33 (CA)
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Hoy, A.C.J.O., van Rensburg and Brown, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33 (CA),2015 ONCA 58,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33 |
Date | 30 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. M.B., 2020 ONSC 7605
...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence: See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. [85] There should be recognition for the further restrictions and conditions that have existed for approximately the last nine months as a ......
-
R. v. MacDougall, 2020 ONSC 4989
...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence; See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. Here, there will be recognition for those further restrictions that have arisen and continued for approximately five months in this case on......
-
R. v. Dufour (C.), 2015 ONCA 426
...by the trial judge. [21] There may be little purpose in reincarcerating where the time remaining is relatively short. [22] R. v. Okash , 2015 ONCA 58 was a recent case involving trafficking of a substance held out to be cocaine. The parties conceded on appeal that the trial judge had given ......
3 cases
-
R. v. M.B., 2020 ONSC 7605
...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence: See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. [85] There should be recognition for the further restrictions and conditions that have existed for approximately the last nine months as a ......
-
R. v. MacDougall, 2020 ONSC 4989
...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence; See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. Here, there will be recognition for those further restrictions that have arisen and continued for approximately five months in this case on......
-
R. v. Dufour (C.), 2015 ONCA 426
...by the trial judge. [21] There may be little purpose in reincarcerating where the time remaining is relatively short. [22] R. v. Okash , 2015 ONCA 58 was a recent case involving trafficking of a substance held out to be cocaine. The parties conceded on appeal that the trial judge had given ......