R. v. Okash (A.), [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33 (CA)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHoy, A.C.J.O., van Rensburg and Brown, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW
Citation[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33 (CA),2015 ONCA 58,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 33
Date30 January 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. M.B., 2020 ONSC 7605
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 8, 2020
    ...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence: See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. [85] There should be recognition for the further restrictions and conditions that have existed for approximately the last nine months as a ......
  • R. v. MacDougall, 2020 ONSC 4989
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2020
    ...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence; See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. Here, there will be recognition for those further restrictions that have arisen and continued for approximately five months in this case on......
  • R. v. Dufour (C.), 2015 ONCA 426
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 28, 2015
    ...by the trial judge. [21] There may be little purpose in reincarcerating where the time remaining is relatively short. [22] R. v. Okash , 2015 ONCA 58 was a recent case involving trafficking of a substance held out to be cocaine. The parties conceded on appeal that the trial judge had given ......
3 cases
  • R. v. M.B., 2020 ONSC 7605
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 8, 2020
    ...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence: See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. [85] There should be recognition for the further restrictions and conditions that have existed for approximately the last nine months as a ......
  • R. v. MacDougall, 2020 ONSC 4989
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 19, 2020
    ...that should be taken in consideration. Other appellate decisions have recognized the impact as a collateral consequence; See R. v. Okash, 2015 ONCA 58. Here, there will be recognition for those further restrictions that have arisen and continued for approximately five months in this case on......
  • R. v. Dufour (C.), 2015 ONCA 426
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 28, 2015
    ...by the trial judge. [21] There may be little purpose in reincarcerating where the time remaining is relatively short. [22] R. v. Okash , 2015 ONCA 58 was a recent case involving trafficking of a substance held out to be cocaine. The parties conceded on appeal that the trial judge had given ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT