R. v. Okash (A.)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Doherty, MacPherson and Lang, JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2009 ONCA 37,[2009] O.A.C. Uned. 17,[2009] O.A.C. Uned. 17 (CA) |
| Date | 15 January 2009 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,POLICE,CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v MacDonald
...are of assistance because they contain elements that also feature in this case, and it is worthwhile to review them here. R. v. Okash , 2009 ONCA 37 62 In Okash, the police had information that the accused was known to carry a gun, but one of the arresting officers testified he was unaware ......
-
R. v. Amanatidis-Palaskas
...Ergut’s evidence, there is no law that because two witnesses give inconsistent evidence, that both are lying:  R. v. Okash, 2009 ONCA 37.  [27]       I have considered the respondent’s argument that looking at the submissions it can be ascert......
-
R v. Woodham
...evidence because they gave inconsistent accounts. That two witnesses give different evidence does not mean both are lying: R. v. Okash, 2009 ONCA 37. This was a fundamental error in assessment of the witnesses. If either witness’s evidence was accepted by itself or raised a reasonable doubt......
3 cases
-
R v MacDonald
...are of assistance because they contain elements that also feature in this case, and it is worthwhile to review them here. R. v. Okash , 2009 ONCA 37 62 In Okash, the police had information that the accused was known to carry a gun, but one of the arresting officers testified he was unaware ......
-
R. v. Amanatidis-Palaskas
...Ergut’s evidence, there is no law that because two witnesses give inconsistent evidence, that both are lying:  R. v. Okash, 2009 ONCA 37.  [27]       I have considered the respondent’s argument that looking at the submissions it can be ascert......
-
R v. Woodham
...evidence because they gave inconsistent accounts. That two witnesses give different evidence does not mean both are lying: R. v. Okash, 2009 ONCA 37. This was a fundamental error in assessment of the witnesses. If either witness’s evidence was accepted by itself or raised a reasonable doubt......