R. v. Okemau (C.P.), [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 161
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Maher, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE,COURTS,EVIDENCE |
| Citation | [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 161,2010 SKQB 280,[2010] Sask.R. Uned. 161 (QB) |
| Date | 05 August 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Klein (G.), 2011 SKQB 94
...(M.R.) (2008), 311 Sask.R. 212; 428 W.A.C. 212; 2008 SKCA 105, refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Okemau (C.P.), [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 161; 2010 SKQB 280, refd to. [para. R. v. Helm (B.E.) (2011), 368 Sask.R. 115; 2011 SKQB 32, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.C.N. (2005), 269 Sask.R. 183; 357 W.A.C. 18......
-
R. v. C.L., 2011 BCSC 857
...the case, but rather a determination of whether the evidence is so weak that a verdict of guilty was unreasonable. 5. In R. v. Okemau , 2010 SKQB 280, Maher J., at paragraph 9, quoted from R. v. B. (R.H.) , [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656 (S.C.C.): In proceeding under s. 686(1)(a)(i), the court of appe......
2 cases
-
R. v. Klein (G.), 2011 SKQB 94
...(M.R.) (2008), 311 Sask.R. 212; 428 W.A.C. 212; 2008 SKCA 105, refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Okemau (C.P.), [2010] Sask.R. Uned. 161; 2010 SKQB 280, refd to. [para. R. v. Helm (B.E.) (2011), 368 Sask.R. 115; 2011 SKQB 32, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. J.C.N. (2005), 269 Sask.R. 183; 357 W.A.C. 18......
-
R. v. C.L., 2011 BCSC 857
...the case, but rather a determination of whether the evidence is so weak that a verdict of guilty was unreasonable. 5. In R. v. Okemau , 2010 SKQB 280, Maher J., at paragraph 9, quoted from R. v. B. (R.H.) , [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656 (S.C.C.): In proceeding under s. 686(1)(a)(i), the court of appe......