R v. Olynik
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Neutral Citation | 2025 SKCA 51 |
| Citation | 2025 SKCA 51 |
| Docket Number | CACR3543; CACR3546 |
| Date | 21 May 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Ritzand
...Kalmakoff J.A. provides helpful guidance on these obligations in R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 at para 134 [Olynik]; and in R v Kachroo, 2025 SKCA 80 at paras 11-15 [Kachroo]. See also: R v Chicoine, 2019 SKCA 104 at paras 66–68 [Chicoine]; R v T.F., 2019 SKCA 82 at paras 59–60; and R v Dillon, ......
-
R v. Herman
...it was insufficient to ground a conviction and, as such, the verdict is unreasonable. [27] A similar argument was made in R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 [Olynik]. As Kalmakoff J.A. discussed, where a verdict based on circumstantial evidence is challenged on appeal, an appellate court does not ret......
-
R v. Lerat
...545. Since Stettner, this Court has released two additional decisions following and applying the principles in Stettner: see R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51, and R v Herman, 2025 SKCA 67. [24] Following G.D.B., the Court observed in Stettner that it has be......
-
R v. Ungar
...of fact that were made, including any inferences the trier of fact drew upon, so long as they applied the law correctly (see R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 at para 35 [Olynik], leave to appeal to SCC requested). [16] The test for whether a verdict is unre......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
R. v. Ritzand
...Kalmakoff J.A. provides helpful guidance on these obligations in R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 at para 134 [Olynik]; and in R v Kachroo, 2025 SKCA 80 at paras 11-15 [Kachroo]. See also: R v Chicoine, 2019 SKCA 104 at paras 66–68 [Chicoine]; R v T.F., 2019 SKCA 82 at paras 59–60; and R v Dillon, ......
-
R v. Herman
...it was insufficient to ground a conviction and, as such, the verdict is unreasonable. [27] A similar argument was made in R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 [Olynik]. As Kalmakoff J.A. discussed, where a verdict based on circumstantial evidence is challenged on appeal, an appellate court does not ret......
-
R v. Lerat
...545. Since Stettner, this Court has released two additional decisions following and applying the principles in Stettner: see R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51, and R v Herman, 2025 SKCA 67. [24] Following G.D.B., the Court observed in Stettner that it has be......
-
R v. Ungar
...of fact that were made, including any inferences the trier of fact drew upon, so long as they applied the law correctly (see R v Olynik, 2025 SKCA 51 at para 35 [Olynik], leave to appeal to SCC requested). [16] The test for whether a verdict is unre......
Get Started for Free
