R v Ong, 2020 MBCA 14

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMr. Justice William J. Burnett,Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella,Madam Justice Karen I. Simonsen
Citation2020 MBCA 14
Docket NumberAR18-30-09142
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Date06 February 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R v Miles, 2020 MBCA 45
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • May 4, 2020
    ...or post-offence conduct.  It was for the trial judge to draw the line between speculative and reasonable inferences (see R v Ong, 2020 MBCA 14 at para 7).  We are satisfied that the inferences drawn by the trial judge having regard to the standard of proof were reasonably open to ......
  • R v Spotted Eagle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 20, 2022
    ...that the verdict was one that a properly instructed trier of fact, acting judicially, could reasonably have rendered (see R v Ong, 2020 MBCA 14 at para 7).  [11]                    ......
2 cases
  • R v Miles, 2020 MBCA 45
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • May 4, 2020
    ...or post-offence conduct.  It was for the trial judge to draw the line between speculative and reasonable inferences (see R v Ong, 2020 MBCA 14 at para 7).  We are satisfied that the inferences drawn by the trial judge having regard to the standard of proof were reasonably open to ......
  • R v Spotted Eagle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • September 20, 2022
    ...that the verdict was one that a properly instructed trier of fact, acting judicially, could reasonably have rendered (see R v Ong, 2020 MBCA 14 at para 7).  [11]                    ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT