R. v. Opeyemi (O.), 2015 ONCA 41
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Feldman, Simmons and Pardu, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,COURTS,EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS |
| Citation | 2015 ONCA 41,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 23 (CA),[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 23 |
| Date | 12 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Powell, 2017 ONSC 7437
...for a maximum of ten years. See R. v. Sharif, 2002 BCCA 95, at paras. 15-20; R. v. Vu, 2012 SCC 40, at para. 19; R. v. Opeyemi, 2015 ONCA 41, at para. 11; R. v. Oppong, 2017 ONSC 6684, at paras. 35-36; R. v. J.P.G., [1996] O.J. No. 4778 (O.C.J.), at para. 143.[24] The rule against multiple ......
-
R. v. Mootoo,
...and examinations as a self-represented litigant to identify his voice in the recorded call. In R. v. Lewers, 2012 ONSC 3869, aff’d 2015 ONCA 41, the trial judge held that there is no principled reason to treat a defendant’s appearance and their voice differently for the purpos......
-
R. v. Oppong, 2017 ONSC 6684
...men of this offence. In my view, this count should be stayed. The facts arise from the same transaction as the kidnapping: R. v. Lewers, 2015 ONCA 41 at para. 11.[37] Count 3 (s. 266(a) and s. 467.12(1) of the Criminal Code) is the assault count and Count 4 (s. 264.1(2)(a) and s. 467.12(1) ......
3 cases
-
R. v. Powell, 2017 ONSC 7437
...for a maximum of ten years. See R. v. Sharif, 2002 BCCA 95, at paras. 15-20; R. v. Vu, 2012 SCC 40, at para. 19; R. v. Opeyemi, 2015 ONCA 41, at para. 11; R. v. Oppong, 2017 ONSC 6684, at paras. 35-36; R. v. J.P.G., [1996] O.J. No. 4778 (O.C.J.), at para. 143.[24] The rule against multiple ......
-
R. v. Mootoo,
...and examinations as a self-represented litigant to identify his voice in the recorded call. In R. v. Lewers, 2012 ONSC 3869, aff’d 2015 ONCA 41, the trial judge held that there is no principled reason to treat a defendant’s appearance and their voice differently for the purpos......
-
R. v. Oppong, 2017 ONSC 6684
...men of this offence. In my view, this count should be stayed. The facts arise from the same transaction as the kidnapping: R. v. Lewers, 2015 ONCA 41 at para. 11.[37] Count 3 (s. 266(a) and s. 467.12(1) of the Criminal Code) is the assault count and Count 4 (s. 264.1(2)(a) and s. 467.12(1) ......