R. v. Otto

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgeDI LUCA J.
Citation2019 ONSC 2473
Date23 April 2019
Docket NumberCR-17-002740

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...343 R v Ostrowski, [1990] 2 SCR 82, 70 Man R (2d) 122, [1990] SCJ No 72 .......... 538 R v Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 ................................................................................. 169 R v Oulton, 2011 ABQB 243 .........................................................................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Search and Seizure
    • May 3, 2021
    ...126 Ottawa Citizen Group Inc , R v , 75 OR (3d) 590, [2005] OJ No 2209 (QL) (CA) ......................... 342 Otto , R v , 2019 ONSC 2473 ............................................................... 168, 505 Otto , R v , 2019 ONSC 2514 .........................................................
  • Search and Seizure
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...phones but not the actual communication. See s 492.2(6), for the precise definition. 432 Sections 492.2(4) & (5). 433 See R v Otto , 2019 ONSC 2473, where the application judge decided that on the record before him, the reasonable suspicion standard was sufficient, but left open the possibi......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Digital Evidence, 2nd Edition Part III - Use of Evidence
    • May 2, 2022
    ...235 Oszenaris, R v , 2008 NLCA 53 ............................................ 153, 154, 162 Otto, R v , 2019 ONSC 2473 .................................................. 72, 77, 78 Otto, R v , 2019 ONSC 2514 ..................................................... 26, 27 Pan, R v , 2014 CanLI......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • R. v. Otto
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 24, 2019
    ...applicant’s electronic devices conducted pursuant to a warrant issued on April 18, 2016. [4] In an earlier Ruling reported at R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473, I dismissed a challenge to the constitutionality of ss. 492.2 and 487.016 of the Criminal Code (the “Code”). I found that the “reasonable......
  • R. v. McPherson
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 10, 2023
    ...must be “grounded in objective facts.” See: R. v. Chehil (2013), 301 C.C.C. (3d) 157 at paras. 22-37 (S.C.C.); R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 per. DiLuca [125]      Much of the evidence that initially implicated Rodgers and Mohamed in the criminal activity......
  • R v Asantarajah
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 23, 2025
    ...stating that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in an IP address: R. v. Nguyen, 2017 ONSC 1341, at para. 36; R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473, at para. 48 During the hearing of the initial s. 8 application, D.C. Tamas of the SCU testified that since the release of Bykovets, the police......
1 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...343 R v Ostrowski, [1990] 2 SCR 82, 70 Man R (2d) 122, [1990] SCJ No 72 .......... 538 R v Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 ................................................................................. 169 R v Oulton, 2011 ABQB 243 .........................................................................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Search and Seizure
    • May 3, 2021
    ...126 Ottawa Citizen Group Inc , R v , 75 OR (3d) 590, [2005] OJ No 2209 (QL) (CA) ......................... 342 Otto , R v , 2019 ONSC 2473 ............................................................... 168, 505 Otto , R v , 2019 ONSC 2514 .........................................................
  • Search and Seizure
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...phones but not the actual communication. See s 492.2(6), for the precise definition. 432 Sections 492.2(4) & (5). 433 See R v Otto , 2019 ONSC 2473, where the application judge decided that on the record before him, the reasonable suspicion standard was sufficient, but left open the possibi......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Digital Evidence, 2nd Edition Part III - Use of Evidence
    • May 2, 2022
    ...235 Oszenaris, R v , 2008 NLCA 53 ............................................ 153, 154, 162 Otto, R v , 2019 ONSC 2473 .................................................. 72, 77, 78 Otto, R v , 2019 ONSC 2514 ..................................................... 26, 27 Pan, R v , 2014 CanLI......
  • Get Started for Free