R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDI LUCA J.
Citation2019 ONSC 2473
Docket NumberCR-17-002740
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date23 April 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...343 R v Ostrowski, [1990] 2 SCR 82, 70 Man R (2d) 122, [1990] SCJ No 72 .......... 538 R v Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 ................................................................................. 169 R v Oulton, 2011 ABQB 243 .........................................................................
  • Search and Seizure
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...phones but not the actual communication. See s 492.2(6), for the precise definition. 432 Sections 492.2(4) & (5). 433 See R v Otto , 2019 ONSC 2473, where the application judge decided that on the record before him, the reasonable suspicion standard was sufficient, but left open the possibi......
  • R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 24, 2019
    ...applicant’s electronic devices conducted pursuant to a warrant issued on April 18, 2016. [4] In an earlier Ruling reported at R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473, I dismissed a challenge to the constitutionality of ss. 492.2 and 487.016 of the Criminal Code (the “Code”). I found that the “reasonable......
  • R. v. McPherson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 10, 2023
    ...must be “grounded in objective facts.” See: R. v. Chehil (2013), 301 C.C.C. (3d) 157 at paras. 22-37 (S.C.C.); R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 per. DiLuca [125]      Much of the evidence that initially implicated Rodgers and Mohamed in the criminal activity......
2 cases
  • R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2514
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 24, 2019
    ...applicant’s electronic devices conducted pursuant to a warrant issued on April 18, 2016. [4] In an earlier Ruling reported at R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473, I dismissed a challenge to the constitutionality of ss. 492.2 and 487.016 of the Criminal Code (the “Code”). I found that the “reasonable......
  • R. v. McPherson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 10, 2023
    ...must be “grounded in objective facts.” See: R. v. Chehil (2013), 301 C.C.C. (3d) 157 at paras. 22-37 (S.C.C.); R. v. Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 per. DiLuca [125]      Much of the evidence that initially implicated Rodgers and Mohamed in the criminal activity......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...343 R v Ostrowski, [1990] 2 SCR 82, 70 Man R (2d) 122, [1990] SCJ No 72 .......... 538 R v Otto, 2019 ONSC 2473 ................................................................................. 169 R v Oulton, 2011 ABQB 243 .........................................................................
  • Search and Seizure
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...phones but not the actual communication. See s 492.2(6), for the precise definition. 432 Sections 492.2(4) & (5). 433 See R v Otto , 2019 ONSC 2473, where the application judge decided that on the record before him, the reasonable suspicion standard was sufficient, but left open the possibi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT