R. v. Pammer, (1979) 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (CA)
Judge | Freedman, C.J.M., Monnin, Matas, O'Sullivan and Huband, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Case Date | May 30, 1979 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (CA) |
R. v. Pammer (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Pammer
Indexed As: R. v. Pammer
Manitoba Court of Appeal
Freedman, C.J.M., Monnin, Matas, O'Sullivan and Huband, JJ.A.
May 30, 1979.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Criminal Law - Topic 5259
Evidence - Admissions - What constitutes - The mother of a three year old child confronted the accused with allegations by the child of the accused's indecent conduct - The accused said that he was sorry and that he didn't mean to touch her, adding "please don't tell your husband" - The Manitoba Court of Appeal held that the accused's statements were tantamount to an admission - See paragraphs 2 to 4.
Criminal Law - Topic 5856
Sentence - Indecent assault - The accused, who was working in a three year old child's home, put his hand under the child's panties - The child's mother was in the next room - The accused had prior convictions of similar offences - He was convicted of indecent assault and sentenced to six months imprisonment and one year probation - The Manitoba Court of Appeal dismissed the Crown's appeal from sentence.
Counsel:
J.G. Dangerfield, for the Crown;
M.W. Israel, for the accused/respondent.
This case was heard on May 30, 1979, at Winnipeg, Manitoba, before FREEDMAN, C.J.M., MONNIN, MATAS, O'SULLIVAN and HUBAND, JJ.A., of the Manitoba Court of Appeal.
On May 30, 1979, FREEDMAN, C.J.M., delivered the following judgment for the Court of Appeal:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Connolly (M.), (2001) 226 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 87 (NFCA)
...refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Finley (Z.V.) (2000), 134 B.C.A.C. 142; 219 W.A.C. 142 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Pammer (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Carlson (P.A.) (1995), 64 B.C.A.C. 124; 105 W.A.C. 124 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C......
-
R. v. Cormier, (1986) 70 N.B.R.(2d) 107 (CA)
...(1976), 26 C.C.C.(2d) 317 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Wells (1978), 7 A.R. 311 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Pammer (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Sandercock (1986), 62 A.R. 382; 22 C.C.C.(3d) 79, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. Sprague et al., [1975] W.W.......
-
R. v. Connolly (M.), (2001) 226 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 87 (NFCA)
...refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Finley (Z.V.) (2000), 134 B.C.A.C. 142; 219 W.A.C. 142 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Pammer (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Carlson (P.A.) (1995), 64 B.C.A.C. 124; 105 W.A.C. 124 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12]. R. v. Khan, [1990] 2 S.C......
-
R. v. Cormier, (1986) 70 N.B.R.(2d) 107 (CA)
...(1976), 26 C.C.C.(2d) 317 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Wells (1978), 7 A.R. 311 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. R. v. Pammer (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 18 (C.A.), refd to. [para. R. v. Sandercock (1986), 62 A.R. 382; 22 C.C.C.(3d) 79, refd to. [para. 26]. R. v. Sprague et al., [1975] W.W.......