R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Judge | Chief Justice Sharkey |
| Citation | 2020 NUCJ 30 |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
| Date | 05 August 2020 |
| Docket Number | 21-20-51, 21-20-38 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Bridges,
...Lee Greencorn, PCPEI 2020, unreported; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26; R. v. Duncan, 2016 ONCA 754; R. v. Persad, 2020 ONSC 188; R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30; R. v. Aiton-Poore, 2021 ONCJ 85; R. v. Dakin, 2020 ONCJ 202; R. v. Marsan, 2020 ONCJ 638; R. v. O.K., 2020 ONCJ 189; R. v. Steckley, 2020 ......
-
The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
...does not award enhanced credit for COVID-19 stating that "such an application was not properly before the court" {ibid at para 142). (72.) 2020 NUCJ 30. (73.) Ibid at para (74.) Ibid at paras 70-71. (75.) See ibid at para 173. (76.) R v Bell, 2020 ONSC 2632 at paras 43-49. (77.) See R v Dak......
-
R. v. Ekpakohak, 2020 NUCJ 31
...FOR JUDGMENT (NOTE: This document may have been edited for publication) I. INTRODUCTION [1] This case is the companion case to R v Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30. My reasons in this decision echo those in Pangon, and my general comments in Pangon regarding sentencing in the age of COVID-19 apply to M......
-
R. v. Panipakoocho,
...decisions from mid-2020 such as my decision of R. v. Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 and Chief Justice Sharkey’s decision of R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30 (and cases cited in each) conditions in remand facilities were very strict, and prisoners were under significant threat from COVID, particula......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Bridges,
...Lee Greencorn, PCPEI 2020, unreported; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26; R. v. Duncan, 2016 ONCA 754; R. v. Persad, 2020 ONSC 188; R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30; R. v. Aiton-Poore, 2021 ONCJ 85; R. v. Dakin, 2020 ONCJ 202; R. v. Marsan, 2020 ONCJ 638; R. v. O.K., 2020 ONCJ 189; R. v. Steckley, 2020 ......
-
R. v. Ekpakohak, 2020 NUCJ 31
...FOR JUDGMENT (NOTE: This document may have been edited for publication) I. INTRODUCTION [1] This case is the companion case to R v Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30. My reasons in this decision echo those in Pangon, and my general comments in Pangon regarding sentencing in the age of COVID-19 apply to M......
-
R. v. Panipakoocho,
...decisions from mid-2020 such as my decision of R. v. Campbell, 2020 NUCJ 28 and Chief Justice Sharkey’s decision of R. v. Pangon, 2020 NUCJ 30 (and cases cited in each) conditions in remand facilities were very strict, and prisoners were under significant threat from COVID, particula......
-
R. v. Kolola,
...the community. Criminal Code, supra note 1, s. 742.1. [34] Transcript of Proceedings, supra note 4 at 35-36, 41. [35] 2020 ONSC 2365. [36] 2020 NUCJ 30 [37] 2020 NUCJ 28 [Campbell]. [38] Ibid at para 32. [39] Pangon, supra note 36 at para 75. [40] Ibid at para 100. [41] R v Nookiguak, 2005 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Pains of Imprisonment in a Pandemic.
...does not award enhanced credit for COVID-19 stating that "such an application was not properly before the court" {ibid at para 142). (72.) 2020 NUCJ 30. (73.) Ibid at para (74.) Ibid at paras 70-71. (75.) See ibid at para 173. (76.) R v Bell, 2020 ONSC 2632 at paras 43-49. (77.) See R v Dak......