R. v. Parkar (H.), 2016 ABPC 169

JudgeFraser, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterPOLICE,CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation2016 ABPC 169
Date13 July 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Digest: R v Weinbender, 2018 SKPC 15
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 8 Marzo 2018
    ...(3d) 1, 66 CR (6th) 1 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169, 132 WCB (2d) 121, 40 Alta LR (6th) 312 R v Primeau, 2016 SKPC 134, 133 WCB (2d) 430, 365 CRR (2d) 291 onsidered saskDigest"> R v Aucoin, 20......
  • R v Fournier, 2017 ABQB 533
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2017
    ...in a police vehicle, is justifiable under ss 8 and 9 of the Charter. He expressed his agreement with the approach taken in R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169 and R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9. He added that courts are able to make decisions on a case-by-case basis as to whether the police have strayed into a......
  • R. v. SHARPE, 2018 MBPC 10
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 13 Marzo 2018
    ...arbitrarily.”   [15]      Justice Ross also considered the decision of Fraser PCJ in R. v. Parkar 2016 ABPC 169:   “In Parkar, Fraser PCJ stated that provincial courts misinterpreted Mann on several occasions. They incorrectly reasoned t......
  • R. v. Murphy, 2018 NBPC 5
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 4 Septiembre 2018
    ...Furthermore, I agree with Judge Bruce R. Fraser of the Provincial Court of Alberta in the case of R v Parkar, (2016) ABPC 169 where he expressed, at paragraph 24, that it is not necessary that the police officer have a specific concern that the individual detainee in his custody is a safety......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • R v Fournier, 2017 ABQB 533
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2017
    ...in a police vehicle, is justifiable under ss 8 and 9 of the Charter. He expressed his agreement with the approach taken in R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169 and R v Kim, 2016 ABPC 9. He added that courts are able to make decisions on a case-by-case basis as to whether the police have strayed into a......
  • R. v. SHARPE, 2018 MBPC 10
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 13 Marzo 2018
    ...arbitrarily.”   [15]      Justice Ross also considered the decision of Fraser PCJ in R. v. Parkar 2016 ABPC 169:   “In Parkar, Fraser PCJ stated that provincial courts misinterpreted Mann on several occasions. They incorrectly reasoned t......
  • R. v. Murphy, 2018 NBPC 5
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 4 Septiembre 2018
    ...Furthermore, I agree with Judge Bruce R. Fraser of the Provincial Court of Alberta in the case of R v Parkar, (2016) ABPC 169 where he expressed, at paragraph 24, that it is not necessary that the police officer have a specific concern that the individual detainee in his custody is a safety......
  • R v Fournier, 2016 ABPC 295
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 2016
    ...topic earlier in a different context in R v Vardanyan, 2016 ABPC 115. Since then counsel provided J. Fraser’s decision in R v Parker, 2016 ABPC 169. Until a higher court definitively rules on this important issue fall on the side represented by Parker and R. v. Kim, 2016 ABPC 9. I cannot in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: R v Weinbender, 2018 SKPC 15
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 8 Marzo 2018
    ...(3d) 1, 66 CR (6th) 1 R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 SCR 59, 324 NR 215, 241 DLR (4th) 214, 185 CCC (3d) 308, 21 CR (6th) 1 R v Parkar, 2016 ABPC 169, 132 WCB (2d) 121, 40 Alta LR (6th) 312 R v Primeau, 2016 SKPC 134, 133 WCB (2d) 430, 365 CRR (2d) 291 onsidered saskDigest"> R v Aucoin, 20......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT