R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler
Citation2020 BCCA 92
Date18 March 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA45215
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • R. v. B.T., 2021 BCSC 948
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...Ms. Sukkau has provided the folowing: C.C.C.; R. v. R.J.H., 2021 BCCA 54; R. v. Williams, 2020 BCCA 286; Friesen; R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92; R. v. Scofield, 2019 BCCA 3; Hamlin; Athey; R. v. E.S., 2017 BCCA 354; R. v. S.L.D., 2017 BCPC 349; R. v. Vautour, 2016 BCCA 497; R. v. R. (E.R.D......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...78 [ Pike], the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216-223 [ Patel]). 40 The prospective assessment of dangerousness required at the designation stage “ensures that only offend......
  • R. v. White, 2022 BCCA 91
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 11, 2022
    ...78 [Pike], the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216–223 [5]            The appellant concedes the predicate offences he......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216-223 [40]           The prospective assessment of dangerousness required at the d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. B.T., 2021 BCSC 948
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 16, 2021
    ...Ms. Sukkau has provided the folowing: C.C.C.; R. v. R.J.H., 2021 BCCA 54; R. v. Williams, 2020 BCCA 286; Friesen; R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92; R. v. Scofield, 2019 BCCA 3; Hamlin; Athey; R. v. E.S., 2017 BCCA 354; R. v. S.L.D., 2017 BCPC 349; R. v. Vautour, 2016 BCCA 497; R. v. R. (E.R.D......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...78 [ Pike], the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216-223 [ Patel]). 40 The prospective assessment of dangerousness required at the designation stage “ensures that only offend......
  • R. v. White, 2022 BCCA 91
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 11, 2022
    ...78 [Pike], the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216–223 [5]            The appellant concedes the predicate offences he......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 28, 2023
    ...the pattern, of which the predicate offence forms a part, defines the prospective assessment of risk (see also R. v. Patel, 2020 BCCA 92 at paras. 216-223 [40]           The prospective assessment of dangerousness required at the d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT