R. v. Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler,The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 251 |
| Docket Number | CA46168 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 15 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
R v Steadman,
...R (7th) 239; R v Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750 at para 76, 153 OR (3d) 350; R v Lenhardt, 2019 ONCA 416 at para 11, 437 CRR (2d) 328; R v Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para 42, 393 CCC (3d) 408; R v Babich, 2020 SKCA 139 at para 30, 398 CCC (3d) 457. [49] The level of deference owed on issues of fact is......
-
R v Santos,
...with what they subjectively, reasonably and non-negligently believed the law to be (Tim at para 85; Le at para 147; R v Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para 55, 393 CCC (3d) 408). Police conduct that demonstrates negligence towards compliance with Charter standards does not amount to......
-
R. v. Berry,
...the admission of unconstitutionally obtained evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”: R. v. Parmar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para. 98. Even in the face of a serious breach, “[d]issociation of the justice system from [state] misconduct does not always trump t......
-
R. v. Lambert and Bailey,
...[64] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 318. [65] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 323. [66] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 50. [67] R. v. Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251, at paras. [68] Voir Dire Decision. [69] R. v. Golub, [1997], 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (O.A.C.), at para. 18. [70] R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, at p......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R v Steadman,
...R (7th) 239; R v Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750 at para 76, 153 OR (3d) 350; R v Lenhardt, 2019 ONCA 416 at para 11, 437 CRR (2d) 328; R v Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para 42, 393 CCC (3d) 408; R v Babich, 2020 SKCA 139 at para 30, 398 CCC (3d) 457. [49] The level of deference owed on issues of fact is......
-
R v Santos,
...with what they subjectively, reasonably and non-negligently believed the law to be (Tim at para 85; Le at para 147; R v Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para 55, 393 CCC (3d) 408). Police conduct that demonstrates negligence towards compliance with Charter standards does not amount to......
-
R. v. Berry,
...the admission of unconstitutionally obtained evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”: R. v. Parmar, 2020 BCCA 251 at para. 98. Even in the face of a serious breach, “[d]issociation of the justice system from [state] misconduct does not always trump t......
-
R. v. Lambert and Bailey,
...[64] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 318. [65] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 323. [66] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 50. [67] R. v. Pawar, 2020 BCCA 251, at paras. [68] Voir Dire Decision. [69] R. v. Golub, [1997], 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (O.A.C.), at para. 18. [70] R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, at p......
Request a trial to view additional results