R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeOttenbreit, Caldwell and Ryan-Froslie JJ.A.
Citation2019 SKCA 113
Docket NumberCACR3019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date01 November 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • R v Laberge,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2021
    ...a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier¸ 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 60 There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell the ......
  • EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 10, 2021
    ...In a relatively recent case, R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113, 381 CCC (3d) 487, the Court of Appeal considered whether the trial judge erred in how she dealt with an extremely difficult cross‑examination. The Court of Appeal stated as follows at paragraphs 169‑170: [169] ......
  • Fraser v Ksenych,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...R v Potoreyko, 2022 SKCA 71 at para 10; Bloomfield v Halfyard, 2020 MBCA 73 at para 8 [Bloomfield]; R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at para 51, 381 CCC (3d) 487; and Dewing v Kostiuk, 2017 MBCA 22 at paras 15 and 22, [2017] 6 WWR 717. Discretionary decisions attract a defer......
  • Saskatchewan v Racette, 2020 SKCA 2
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 3, 2020
    ...have an obligation to manage the trial, including controlling witnesses and making sure their testimony stays on track: R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 51 and 103. Dr. Ladham was not answering the questions that were being asked by his own counsel and was providing his evidence i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • R v Laberge,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2021
    ...a credible witness’s testimony is not necessarily reliable: see Morrissey, H.C., Patrick, Schaff, Wolff, and R v Pelletier¸ 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 60 There are many reasons why witnesses – who are forthright, acting in good faith and honestly doing their best to tell the ......
  • EVANGELOS TSIAPLAS v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 10, 2021
    ...In a relatively recent case, R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113, 381 CCC (3d) 487, the Court of Appeal considered whether the trial judge erred in how she dealt with an extremely difficult cross‑examination. The Court of Appeal stated as follows at paragraphs 169‑170: [169] ......
  • Fraser v Ksenych,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...R v Potoreyko, 2022 SKCA 71 at para 10; Bloomfield v Halfyard, 2020 MBCA 73 at para 8 [Bloomfield]; R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at para 51, 381 CCC (3d) 487; and Dewing v Kostiuk, 2017 MBCA 22 at paras 15 and 22, [2017] 6 WWR 717. Discretionary decisions attract a defer......
  • Saskatchewan v Racette, 2020 SKCA 2
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 3, 2020
    ...have an obligation to manage the trial, including controlling witnesses and making sure their testimony stays on track: R v Pelletier, 2019 SKCA 113 at paras 51 and 103. Dr. Ladham was not answering the questions that were being asked by his own counsel and was providing his evidence i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT