R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFrankel,Stromberg-Stein,Savage
Citation2019 BCCA 76
Date06 March 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA44748
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • R v Goforth,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...(3d) 333; R v Muise, 2015 NSCA 54 at para 36, 324 CCC (3d) 525; R v Grant, 2016 ONCA 639 at para 111, 342 CCC (3d) 514; and R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76 at para 43, 372 CCC (3d) 147; but see R v Owusu, 2006 ABCA 198 at para 2, referring to a “realistic possibility” that the instruction misled t......
  • R. v. Schneider,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...meaning of the question”: R. v. Shannon, 2011 BCCA 270 at para. 51. See also R. v. Bradshaw, 2020 BCCA 97 at paras. 19–27; R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76 at para. 40; R. v. Kahnapace, 2010 BCCA 227 at paras. [123] However, I agree with the Crown that in the circumstances of this case, seeking c......
  • R. v. Kulcsar, 2020 BCSC 682
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 1, 2020
    ...[26]        The elements of the offence created by s. 86(1) were recently summarized in R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76.  There, Justice Frankel, writing for the court, [30]      With respect to careless use of a firearm the actus ......
  • R. v. Bradshaw, 2020 BCCA 97
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 24, 2020
    ...that is unclear or ambiguous so the answer properly addresses the precise nature of the jury's concerns or confusion": R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, at para. 40. The trial judge failed in her obligation to assist the jury as she failed to provide any answer to the jury's question, let alone a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • R v Goforth,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...(3d) 333; R v Muise, 2015 NSCA 54 at para 36, 324 CCC (3d) 525; R v Grant, 2016 ONCA 639 at para 111, 342 CCC (3d) 514; and R v Penner, 2019 BCCA 76 at para 43, 372 CCC (3d) 147; but see R v Owusu, 2006 ABCA 198 at para 2, referring to a “realistic possibility” that the instruction misled t......
  • R. v. Schneider,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 2, 2021
    ...meaning of the question”: R. v. Shannon, 2011 BCCA 270 at para. 51. See also R. v. Bradshaw, 2020 BCCA 97 at paras. 19–27; R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76 at para. 40; R. v. Kahnapace, 2010 BCCA 227 at paras. [123] However, I agree with the Crown that in the circumstances of this case, seeking c......
  • R. v. Kulcsar, 2020 BCSC 682
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 1, 2020
    ...[26]        The elements of the offence created by s. 86(1) were recently summarized in R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76.  There, Justice Frankel, writing for the court, [30]      With respect to careless use of a firearm the actus ......
  • R. v. Bradshaw, 2020 BCCA 97
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • March 24, 2020
    ...that is unclear or ambiguous so the answer properly addresses the precise nature of the jury's concerns or confusion": R. v. Penner, 2019 BCCA 76, at para. 40. The trial judge failed in her obligation to assist the jury as she failed to provide any answer to the jury's question, let alone a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT