R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2019 SCC 39
Docket Number38004
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date05 July 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
56 practice notes
  • Fleming v. Ontario, 2019 SCC 45
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 4, 2019
    ...Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, [2006] UKHL 55, [2007] 2 All E.R. 529; Frey v. Fedoruk, [1950] S.C.R. 517; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; R. v. Knowlton, [1974] S.C.R. 443; R. v. C.E., 2009 NSCA 79, 279 N.S.R. (2d) 391; Bibby v. Chief Constable of Essex Police, [2000] EWCA Civ......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. British Columbia Investment Management Corp., 2019 SCC 63
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 13, 2019
    ...Marie, [1954] S.C.R. 404; Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 795; Csak v. Aumon (1990), 69 D.L.R. (4th) 567; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; Trident Holdings Ltd. v. Danand Investments Ltd. (1988), 64 O.R. (2d) 65; De Mond v. The Queen (1999), 99 D.T.C. 893; Smith v. Rural Municipal......
  • R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 18, 2020
    ...103; R. v. Myers, 2019 SCC 18; R. v. Schab, 2016 YKTC 69, 35 C.R. (7th) 48; R. v. Prychitko, 2010 ABQB 563, 618 A.R. 146; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; R. v. McCormack, 2014 ONSC 7123; R. v. Burdon, 2010 ABCA 171, 487 A.R. 220; R. v. Rowan, 2018 ABPC 208; R. v. Hundal, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 867; R.......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 10, 2020
    ...12(1), 12.1(2), 13, 13(1), 13.001, Di Francesco v. Di Francesco, 2011 ONSC 3844, Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39, Kelly v. Kelly, 2017 ONSC 7609, Humphreys v. Humphreys (1987), 1987 CarswellOnt 309, Martin v. Martin, 2018 ONSC 6804, Berta v. Berta, 2015 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
43 cases
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. British Columbia Investment Management Corp., 2019 SCC 63
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 13, 2019
    ...Marie, [1954] S.C.R. 404; Pecore v. Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 795; Csak v. Aumon (1990), 69 D.L.R. (4th) 567; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; Trident Holdings Ltd. v. Danand Investments Ltd. (1988), 64 O.R. (2d) 65; De Mond v. The Queen (1999), 99 D.T.C. 893; Smith v. Rural Municipal......
  • Fleming v. Ontario, 2019 SCC 45
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 4, 2019
    ...Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary, [2006] UKHL 55, [2007] 2 All E.R. 529; Frey v. Fedoruk, [1950] S.C.R. 517; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; R. v. Knowlton, [1974] S.C.R. 443; R. v. C.E., 2009 NSCA 79, 279 N.S.R. (2d) 391; Bibby v. Chief Constable of Essex Police, [2000] EWCA Civ......
  • R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 18, 2020
    ...103; R. v. Myers, 2019 SCC 18; R. v. Schab, 2016 YKTC 69, 35 C.R. (7th) 48; R. v. Prychitko, 2010 ABQB 563, 618 A.R. 146; R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39; R. v. McCormack, 2014 ONSC 7123; R. v. Burdon, 2010 ABCA 171, 487 A.R. 220; R. v. Rowan, 2018 ABPC 208; R. v. Hundal, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 867; R.......
  • R v Baker,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...require”. The legal Latinism often used for this expression is mutatis mutandis, the scope of which was described in R v Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39 at paras 51-52, [2019] 3 SCR 91 as adapting the procedures being transposed to serve the “context and purpose” of the adopting p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 10, 2020
    ...12(1), 12.1(2), 13, 13(1), 13.001, Di Francesco v. Di Francesco, 2011 ONSC 3844, Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39, Kelly v. Kelly, 2017 ONSC 7609, Humphreys v. Humphreys (1987), 1987 CarswellOnt 309, Martin v. Martin, 2018 ONSC 6804, Berta v. Berta, 2015 ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 11, 2022 ' July 15, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 18, 2022
    ...- Canada v. T.C.T. Logistics Inc., 2006 SCC 35, Braich (Re), 2007 BCSC 1604, R. v. Nowegijick, [1983] 1 S.C.R. 29, R. v. Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39, Grimanis v. Harris & Partners Inc., 2009 CanLII 10673 (Ont. S.C.), The Bank of Nova Scotia v. David Allin, 2013 ONSC 7937, Society of Composers, Aut......
8 books & journal articles
  • Arrest
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...it was constitutional. The decision was affirmed on appeal ( R v Budreo (2000), 142 CCC (3d) 225 (Ont CA)). In R v Penunsi , 2019 SCC 39 the Court did not explicitly comment on the constitutionality question: however, at para 69 they adopted from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Budr......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • June 23, 2020
    ...123 R v Penunsi, 2016 NLCA 50 ................................................................................561 R v Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39 .................................................................... 58, 289, 315 R v Perkins, 2016 ONCA 588, 339 CCC (3d) 438, [2016] CarswellOnt 12019......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • February 27, 2024
    ...61 R v Penner, 2004 ABQB 98 .................................................................................. 139 R v Penunsi, 2019 SCC 39 .................................................................. 211, 213, 215 R v Perello, 2005 SKCA 8 ...................................................
  • Process and Procedure
    • Canada
    • Immigration Law Series Inadmissibility and Remedies
    • April 30, 2022
    ...a “rejuvenated” approach to the detention regime ( Arook at para 19), but also those enunciated in the unanimous decision in R v Penunsi , 2019 SCC 39 with respect to the “ladder” principle in preventative restrictions; i.e., moving up the conditions “ladder” only if cause can be shown why ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT