R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | S.A.Q. AKHTAR J. |
| Docket Number | CR-19-30000083-00AP |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 08 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
R. v. Iftikhar,
...No. 127 at para. 23 (C.J.), affd [2004] O.J. No. 1435, 70 O.R. (3d) 540 (S.C.J.). [2] R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413; R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC [3] R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] SCJ No. 59 at para. 61. [4] Jhite at para. 92. [5] R. v. Grant, [2009] 2 S.C.......
-
R. v. Gardner,
...have been several summary conviction appeal courts that have rejected this notion of an enhanced “minimum standard”: see R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413, 464 C.R.R. (2d) 138, at paras. 89-101; R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, 459 C.R.R. (2d) 235, at paras. 40, 52,58-59, 73; R. v. Blackett, [2......
-
R. v. Dickson,
...own lawyer by accessing a phone book, lawyers’ directory or the internet: R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413; R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC 2442. [77] In Wijesuriya, the accused gave the police the name and......
-
R. v. Coates,
...be expanded in this manner has already been rejected by some judges of this court: see R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC 2442 and R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413. While I will not address this issue further here, I previously explained in my reasons in R. v. Doobay, 2019 ONSC 2442 at paras. 53-56 why ......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
R. v. Iftikhar,
...No. 127 at para. 23 (C.J.), affd [2004] O.J. No. 1435, 70 O.R. (3d) 540 (S.C.J.). [2] R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413; R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC [3] R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, [2017] SCJ No. 59 at para. 61. [4] Jhite at para. 92. [5] R. v. Grant, [2009] 2 S.C.......
-
R. v. Gardner,
...have been several summary conviction appeal courts that have rejected this notion of an enhanced “minimum standard”: see R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413, 464 C.R.R. (2d) 138, at paras. 89-101; R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, 459 C.R.R. (2d) 235, at paras. 40, 52,58-59, 73; R. v. Blackett, [2......
-
R. v. Dickson,
...own lawyer by accessing a phone book, lawyers’ directory or the internet: R. v. Wijesuriya, 2020 ONSC 253, R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413; R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC 2442. [77] In Wijesuriya, the accused gave the police the name and......
-
R. v. Coates,
...be expanded in this manner has already been rejected by some judges of this court: see R. v. Ruscica, 2019 ONSC 2442 and R. v. Persaud, 2020 ONSC 3413. While I will not address this issue further here, I previously explained in my reasons in R. v. Doobay, 2019 ONSC 2442 at paras. 53-56 why ......
Request a trial to view additional results