R. v. Poletz (B.), 2015 SKQB 114

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeGabrielson, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW
Citation2015 SKQB 114,[2015] Sask.R. Uned. 22 (QB),[2015] Sask.R. Uned. 22
Date20 April 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Osmond (E.), (2015) 475 Sask.R. 171 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 25, 2015
    ...believing Ms. Osmond means that I automatically must acquit her. Rather, in this regard the case is like the situation in R. v. Poletz , 2015 SKQB 114 at paragraphs 14 and 17. I accept that events occurred as Ms. Osmond related them, but I still am required to determine whether the facts es......
  • McKENZIE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2020 SKQB 206
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 20, 2020
    ...Sask R 167; R v Kinzel, 2013 SKQB 201, 421 Sask R 174; R v Binetruy, 2014 SKPC 3, 437 Sask R 120; R v Guraluick 2015 SKQB 50; R v Poletz, 2015 SKQB 114; and the judgment of this Court in Cramer. [36]               &#......
2 cases
  • R. v. Osmond (E.), (2015) 475 Sask.R. 171 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 25, 2015
    ...believing Ms. Osmond means that I automatically must acquit her. Rather, in this regard the case is like the situation in R. v. Poletz , 2015 SKQB 114 at paragraphs 14 and 17. I accept that events occurred as Ms. Osmond related them, but I still am required to determine whether the facts es......
  • McKENZIE v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2020 SKQB 206
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 20, 2020
    ...Sask R 167; R v Kinzel, 2013 SKQB 201, 421 Sask R 174; R v Binetruy, 2014 SKPC 3, 437 Sask R 120; R v Guraluick 2015 SKQB 50; R v Poletz, 2015 SKQB 114; and the judgment of this Court in Cramer. [36]               &#......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT