R. v. Post, (1986) 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt)

JudgeNeville, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 27, 1986
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations(1986), 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt)

R. v. Post (1986), 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt)

MLB headnote and full text

R. v. Post

Indexed As: R. v. Post

Saskatchewan Provincial Court

Neville, P.C.J.

January 27, 1986.

Summary:

An accused was charged with four counts of making false statements respecting a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, contrary to s. 121(1)(a) of the Unemployment Insurance Act.

The Saskatchewan Provincial Court convicted the accused.

Civil Rights - Topic 3265

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Speedy trial - Accused's right to - "Within a reasonable time" - What constitutes - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that pre-charge delay should not be considered in determining whether an accused's right to be tried within a reasonable time in s. 11(b) of the Charter was denied - See paragraphs 7 to 8.

Civil Rights - Topic 3265

Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Speedy trial - Accused's right to - "Within a reasonable time" - What constitutes - Between the date the accused was served with a summons and the date of his trial was a period of 6.5 months - During this time, two of the three adjournments were at his request and he was resummoned once to permit him to consult counsel - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that the delay was reasonable - See paragraph 8.

Civil Rights - Topic 8545

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Interpretation - Charged with an offence - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that the words "charged with an offence" mean the same in s. 11(b) of the Charter as they do in s. 11(a) - See paragraph 7.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Dahlem (1983), 26 Sask.R. 36; 33 C.R.(3d) 345, overruled [para. 7].

R. v. Boron (1983), 36 C.R.(3d) 329 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 7].

R. v. Heit (1984), 31 Sask.R. 126, refd to. [para. 7].

Statutes Noticed:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 11(a) [para. 7]; sect. 11(b) [para. 2, 7-8]; sect. 24 [para. 2].

Counsel:

D. Kohlenberg, for the Crown;

B. Campbell, for the accused.

This charge was heard before Neville, P.C.J., of the Saskatchewan Provincial Court, whose decision was delivered at Weyburn, Saskatchewan, on January 27, 1986.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT