R. v. Post, (1986) 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt)
Judge | Neville, P.C.J. |
Court | Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Case Date | January 27, 1986 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1986), 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt) |
R. v. Post (1986), 48 Sask.R. 301 (ProvCt)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Post
Indexed As: R. v. Post
Saskatchewan Provincial Court
Neville, P.C.J.
January 27, 1986.
Summary:
An accused was charged with four counts of making false statements respecting a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, contrary to s. 121(1)(a) of the Unemployment Insurance Act.
The Saskatchewan Provincial Court convicted the accused.
Civil Rights - Topic 3265
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Speedy trial - Accused's right to - "Within a reasonable time" - What constitutes - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that pre-charge delay should not be considered in determining whether an accused's right to be tried within a reasonable time in s. 11(b) of the Charter was denied - See paragraphs 7 to 8.
Civil Rights - Topic 3265
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Speedy trial - Accused's right to - "Within a reasonable time" - What constitutes - Between the date the accused was served with a summons and the date of his trial was a period of 6.5 months - During this time, two of the three adjournments were at his request and he was resummoned once to permit him to consult counsel - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that the delay was reasonable - See paragraph 8.
Civil Rights - Topic 8545
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Interpretation - Charged with an offence - The Saskatchewan Provincial Court held that the words "charged with an offence" mean the same in s. 11(b) of the Charter as they do in s. 11(a) - See paragraph 7.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Dahlem (1983), 26 Sask.R. 36; 33 C.R.(3d) 345, overruled [para. 7].
R. v. Boron (1983), 36 C.R.(3d) 329 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 7].
R. v. Heit (1984), 31 Sask.R. 126, refd to. [para. 7].
Statutes Noticed:
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982, sect. 11(a) [para. 7]; sect. 11(b) [para. 2, 7-8]; sect. 24 [para. 2].
Counsel:
D. Kohlenberg, for the Crown;
B. Campbell, for the accused.
This charge was heard before Neville, P.C.J., of the Saskatchewan Provincial Court, whose decision was delivered at Weyburn, Saskatchewan, on January 27, 1986.
To continue reading
Request your trial