R v Prockner, 2018 SKCA 52

JudgeRichards C.J.S., Ottenbreit and Whitmore JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateJuly 04, 2018
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations2018 SKCA 52
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R v R.D.F., 2019 SKCA 112
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 31 Octubre 2019
    ...court level in R v Prockner, 2017 SKQB 202 at para 73, and was not commented on or disturbed on appeal to this Court in R v Prockner, 2018 SKCA 52 [Prockner]. I am satisfied that the sentencing judge’s determination of the standard of proof does not require this Court to intervene, on its o......
  • R v W.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...enough to warrant the setting aside of his decision. … [23]        As indicated in R v Prockner, 2018 SKCA 52 at para 66, this Court may not simply reconsider the evidence presented to the sentencing judge and then substitute its assessment of the i......
2 cases
  • R v R.D.F., 2019 SKCA 112
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 31 Octubre 2019
    ...court level in R v Prockner, 2017 SKQB 202 at para 73, and was not commented on or disturbed on appeal to this Court in R v Prockner, 2018 SKCA 52 [Prockner]. I am satisfied that the sentencing judge’s determination of the standard of proof does not require this Court to intervene, on its o......
  • R v W.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...enough to warrant the setting aside of his decision. … [23]        As indicated in R v Prockner, 2018 SKCA 52 at para 66, this Court may not simply reconsider the evidence presented to the sentencing judge and then substitute its assessment of the i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT