R v Profeit
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0088A |
| Date | 23 November 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 practice notes
-
R v Peets
...appellant’s vehicle without any security. As pointed out in R v Rakka, 2024 ABCA 1 at para 32, [2024] AJ No 11 (QL), citing R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at para 73, 407 CCC (3d) 494, the "role of the trier of fact in a circumstantial evidence case is entitled to be respected in the same way a......
-
R v. Roebuck
...the standard of proof in a criminal case: Villaroman, para 55; R v Bjornson, 2018 ABCA 282, para 17, 365 CCC (3d) 175; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, paras 72-74, 407 CCC (3d) 494; R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394, para 27; R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328, para 22, 316 CCC (3d) 357. [23] Such a verdict in......
-
R v Flagler
...case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241 at para 5, aff’d 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568 and many other recent decisions noted in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 67-71, 407 CCC (3d) 494. In this case, the trial judge’s findings are supported on the record and the appellant has not shown the v......
-
R v BEM
...Awer, 2016 ABCA 128 at para 35; 405 DLR (4th) 463, reversed on a different point, 2017 SCC 2, [2017] 1 SCR 83. See also R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 128-129, 407 CCC (3d) 494. It should be recalled that the compendious description of facts concept mentioned in R v Graat, [1982] ......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R v Tallcree
...don’t even know her.” [327]       The Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 quotes from the trial decision at para 56, where Justice Pentelechuk, as she then was, stated that “As defence counsel points out, Profeit......
-
R v Bakko
...merely because the appeal court concludes that the evidence, including its gaps, gives rise to competing inferences: R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, para 74, 407 CCC (3d) 494. Analysis (a) Causation [20] &......
-
R v. Candaele
...merely because the appeal court concludes that the evidence, including its gaps, gives rise to competing inferences: R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, para 74, 407 CCC (3d) 494. [46] In this case, the question the trial judge was required to answer was whether the evidence, including its gaps, ga......
-
R v. Tolchinsky
...available on the totality of the evidence: R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 at paras 2, 26; R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 at paras 55, 71; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 72-74; Rakka at para 17; RP at paras 9-10. A judge’s assessment of “the only available inferences” ̶ excluding alternat......
Get Started for Free
