R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0088A |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Date | 23 November 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
R v Roebuck,
...the standard of proof in a criminal case: Villaroman, para 55; R v Bjornson, 2018 ABCA 282, para 17, 365 CCC (3d) 175; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, paras 72-74, 407 CCC (3d) 494; R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394, para 27; R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328, para 22, 316 CCC (3d) 23 Such a verdict in a circ......
-
R v Tallcree,
...don’t even know her.” [327] The Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 quotes from the trial decision at para 56, where Justice Pentelechuk, as she then was, stated that “As defence counsel points out, Profeit......
-
R v Mongeon,
...reweigh the evidence and retry the case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241 at para 5, aff'd 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 69-71, 407 CCC (3d) 18 Moreover, insufficiency of reasons, on its own, is not a standalone ground of appeal warranting overturning ......
-
R v Candaele,
...merely because the appeal court concludes that the evidence, including its gaps, gives rise to competing inferences: R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, para 74, 407 CCC (3d) 46 In this case, the question the trial judge was required to answer was whether the evidence, including its gaps, gave rise......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R v Roebuck,
...the standard of proof in a criminal case: Villaroman, para 55; R v Bjornson, 2018 ABCA 282, para 17, 365 CCC (3d) 175; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, paras 72-74, 407 CCC (3d) 494; R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394, para 27; R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328, para 22, 316 CCC (3d) 23 Such a verdict in a circ......
-
R v Tallcree,
...don’t even know her.” [327] The Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 quotes from the trial decision at para 56, where Justice Pentelechuk, as she then was, stated that “As defence counsel points out, Profeit......
-
R v Mongeon,
...reweigh the evidence and retry the case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241 at para 5, aff'd 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 69-71, 407 CCC (3d) 18 Moreover, insufficiency of reasons, on its own, is not a standalone ground of appeal warranting overturning ......
-
R v Candaele,
...merely because the appeal court concludes that the evidence, including its gaps, gives rise to competing inferences: R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, para 74, 407 CCC (3d) 46 In this case, the question the trial judge was required to answer was whether the evidence, including its gaps, gave rise......
Get Started for Free