R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379
| Judge | The Honourable Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0088A |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 379 |
| Date | 23 November 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
R v Roebuck,
...the standard of proof in a criminal case: Villaroman, para 55; R v Bjornson, 2018 ABCA 282, para 17, 365 CCC (3d) 175; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, paras 72-74, 407 CCC (3d) 494; R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394, para 27; R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328, para 22, 316 CCC (3d) 23 Such a verdict in a circ......
-
R v Tallcree,
...don’t even know her.” [327] The Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 quotes from the trial decision at para 56, where Justice Pentelechuk, as she then was, stated that “As defence counsel points out, Profeit......
-
R v Tolchinsky,
...available on the totality of the evidence: R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 at paras 2, 26; R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 at paras 55, 71; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 72-74; Rakka at para 17; RP at paras 9-10. A judge's assessment of “the only available inferences” ? excluding alternatives ? can b......
-
R v Mongeon,
...reweigh the evidence and retry the case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241 at para 5, aff'd 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 69-71, 407 CCC (3d) 18 Moreover, insufficiency of reasons, on its own, is not a standalone ground of appeal warranting overturning ......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R v Roebuck,
...the standard of proof in a criminal case: Villaroman, para 55; R v Bjornson, 2018 ABCA 282, para 17, 365 CCC (3d) 175; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379, paras 72-74, 407 CCC (3d) 494; R v Anny, 2021 ABCA 394, para 27; R v Dipnarine, 2014 ABCA 328, para 22, 316 CCC (3d) 23 Such a verdict in a circ......
-
R v Tallcree,
...don’t even know her.” [327] The Court of Appeal’s decision in R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 quotes from the trial decision at para 56, where Justice Pentelechuk, as she then was, stated that “As defence counsel points out, Profeit......
-
R v Tolchinsky,
...available on the totality of the evidence: R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 at paras 2, 26; R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 at paras 55, 71; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 72-74; Rakka at para 17; RP at paras 9-10. A judge's assessment of “the only available inferences” ? excluding alternatives ? can b......
-
R v Mongeon,
...reweigh the evidence and retry the case: R v Demedeiros, 2018 ABCA 241 at para 5, aff'd 2019 SCC 11, [2019] 1 SCR 568; R v Profeit, 2021 ABCA 379 at paras 69-71, 407 CCC (3d) 18 Moreover, insufficiency of reasons, on its own, is not a standalone ground of appeal warranting overturning ......
Get Started for Free