R. v. Quartey, 2018 SCC 59

JudgeMoldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Martin, Sheilah
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateDecember 19, 2018
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2018 SCC 59
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...ONCA 774 at paras 18 and 43, 330 CCC (3d) 497 [Gravesande]; and R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12 at para 42, 430 DLR (4th) 381 [Quartey] (aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687). [30] Being a question of law, the standard of review on this issue is one of correctness: Quartey at para 15; R v S.M.C., ......
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2021
    ...[9]          These conclusions were also confirmed in R. v. Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, affirmed 2018 SCC 59[4]: 15        Assessments of credibility involve questions of fact that are afforded deference and should n......
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 7, 2020
    ...trial judge implemented a faulty methodology in deciding credibility: R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, para 42, 430 DLR (4th) 381, aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Wanihadie, 2019 ABCA 402, para 22, 99 Alta LR (6th) 56; R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19, para [12]     ......
  • R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...at para 37, [R v CAM, 2017 MBCA 70, 354 CCC (3d) 100] quoted in Quartey at para 42 [R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, 430 DLR (4th) 381, aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687]. Because questions of credibility are owed great deference on appeal, the concept of “uneven scrutiny” must never be allowed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...ONCA 774 at paras 18 and 43, 330 CCC (3d) 497 [Gravesande]; and R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12 at para 42, 430 DLR (4th) 381 [Quartey] (aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687). [30] Being a question of law, the standard of review on this issue is one of correctness: Quartey at para 15; R v S.M.C., ......
  • R. v. Taylor, 2021 NSSC 120
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 28, 2021
    ...[9]          These conclusions were also confirmed in R. v. Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, affirmed 2018 SCC 59[4]: 15        Assessments of credibility involve questions of fact that are afforded deference and should n......
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 7, 2020
    ...trial judge implemented a faulty methodology in deciding credibility: R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, para 42, 430 DLR (4th) 381, aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687; R v Wanihadie, 2019 ABCA 402, para 22, 99 Alta LR (6th) 56; R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19, para [12]     ......
  • R v Parr, 2020 NUCA 2
    • Canada
    • Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...at para 37, [R v CAM, 2017 MBCA 70, 354 CCC (3d) 100] quoted in Quartey at para 42 [R v Quartey, 2018 ABCA 12, 430 DLR (4th) 381, aff’d 2018 SCC 59, [2018] 3 SCR 687]. Because questions of credibility are owed great deference on appeal, the concept of “uneven scrutiny” must never be allowed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT