R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2021 SCC 10 |
| Docket Number | 38854 |
| Date | 12 March 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
R. v. Cowan,
...469; R. v. Pickton, 2010 SCC 32, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 198; R. v. Isaac, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 74; R. v. Thatcher, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 652; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; considered: R. v. Ekman, 2006 BCCA 206, 209 C.C.C. (3d) 121; R. v. Ekman, 2004 BCSC 900; refer......
-
R v Wolfe, 2021 SKCA 39
...the evidence” (Pittiman at para 10; Goforth at para 32; see also: R v J.F., 2008 SCC 60 at para 23, [2008] 3 SCR 215; and R v R.V., 2021 SCC 10 at paras [122] In this case, the only basis upon which the jury was instructed that it could return a verdict of fir......
-
R v Napope,
...Court of Canada, which directed that this matter be remanded to this Court for disposition in accordance with the decision in R v R.V., 2021 SCC 10, 402 CCC (3d) 295 [R.V.] [remand order]. Having reconsidered the appeal in light of the guidance provided by R.V. in relation to the reconcilia......
-
R v Walton,
...properly instructed, could possibly have rendered them on the evidence? [105] More recently, R v RV, 2021 SCC 10 addressed the issue of whether a legal error in a jury instruction can reconcile apparently inconsistent verdicts, and more generally reviewed......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
R. v. Cowan,
...469; R. v. Pickton, 2010 SCC 32, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 198; R. v. Isaac, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 74; R. v. Thatcher, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 652; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; considered: R. v. Ekman, 2006 BCCA 206, 209 C.C.C. (3d) 121; R. v. Ekman, 2004 BCSC 900; refer......
-
R v Wolfe, 2021 SKCA 39
...the evidence” (Pittiman at para 10; Goforth at para 32; see also: R v J.F., 2008 SCC 60 at para 23, [2008] 3 SCR 215; and R v R.V., 2021 SCC 10 at paras [122] In this case, the only basis upon which the jury was instructed that it could return a verdict of fir......
-
R v Napope,
...Court of Canada, which directed that this matter be remanded to this Court for disposition in accordance with the decision in R v R.V., 2021 SCC 10, 402 CCC (3d) 295 [R.V.] [remand order]. Having reconsidered the appeal in light of the guidance provided by R.V. in relation to the reconcilia......
-
R v McKechnie,
...jury instructions: Pittiman, paras 7-8. The jury did not find Mr McKechnie guilty and not guilty of the same conduct: see R v RV, 2021 SCC 10, para 31, 402 CCC (3d) [32] The actions of bruising and biting were presented to be temporally and logicall......
Request a trial to view additional results