R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Citation2021 SCC 10
Date12 March 2021
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number38854
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
40 practice notes
  • R. v. Archambault,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 73, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 131; Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 289; R. v. White, 2022 SCC 7; ......
  • R. v. Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2023
    ...3; R. v. Aalders, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 482; R. v. Maxwell (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 322; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. Connors, 2007 NLCA 55, 269 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 179; R. v. Smith, 2010 BCCA 35, 282 B.C.A.C. 145; R. v......
  • R v Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2023
    ...3; R. v. Aalders, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 482; R. v. Maxwell (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 322; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. Connors, 2007 NLCA 55, 269 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 179; R. v. Smith, 2010 BCCA 35, 282 B.C.A.C. 145; R. v......
  • R. v. Cowan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...469; R. v. Pickton, 2010 SCC 32, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 198; R. v. Isaac, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 74; R. v. Thatcher, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 652; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; considered: R. v. Ekman, 2006 BCCA 206, 209 C.C.C. (3d) 121; R. v. Ekman, 2004 BCSC 900; refer......
  • Get Started for Free
36 cases
  • R. v. Archambault,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...States of America v. Shephard, [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067; Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 73, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10, [2021] 1 S.C.R. 131; Tran v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 289; R. v. White, 2022 SCC 7; ......
  • R. v. Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2023
    ...3; R. v. Aalders, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 482; R. v. Maxwell (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 322; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. Connors, 2007 NLCA 55, 269 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 179; R. v. Smith, 2010 BCCA 35, 282 B.C.A.C. 145; R. v......
  • R v Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 14, 2023
    ...3; R. v. Aalders, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 482; R. v. Maxwell (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 322; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262; R. v. Connors, 2007 NLCA 55, 269 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 179; R. v. Smith, 2010 BCCA 35, 282 B.C.A.C. 145; R. v......
  • R. v. Cowan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...469; R. v. Pickton, 2010 SCC 32, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 198; R. v. Isaac, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 74; R. v. Thatcher, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 652; R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10; R. v. MacKay, 2005 SCC 79, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; considered: R. v. Ekman, 2006 BCCA 206, 209 C.C.C. (3d) 121; R. v. Ekman, 2004 BCSC 900; refer......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Offences Against Children, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2023
    .... 371-72 Russell , R v , 2010 NBPC 21, [2010] NBJ No 133 (QL) (Prov Ct) ............................ 367 RV , R v , 2021 SCC 10 .............................................................. 192 RW , R v , 2021 CanLII 62450, [2021] NJ No 211 (QL) (Prov Ct) ........................... 123 Ry......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Criminal Appeals - Second edition
    • December 2, 2024
    ...13, 128-29 Russell , 2001 SCC 53 ...................................................... 134-35 RV , R v , 2021 SCC 10 ......................................................... 40 S(RD) , R v , [1997] 3 SCR 484, 1997 CanLII 324 ................................ 45, 138 Saddleback , R v , 2022......
  • Sexual Offences Against Children
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Offences Against Children, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2023
    ...accused and the complainant. 145 R v SL , supra note 143 at paras 28, 35-43; R v Tyler , supra note 143 at paras 3-12. See also R v RV , 2021 SCC 10 at paras 51-53, 60, 64, where the Supreme Court explained that “touching” and “force” mean the same thing within the context of ss 151, 152, a......
  • Grounds of Appeal
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Criminal Appeals - Second edition
    • December 2, 2024
    ...to demonstrate either error or the frustration of appellate review: Sheppard , at para. 54. Neither are demonstrated by merely 22 R v RV , 2021 SCC 10 . 23 R v GF , 2021 SCC 20 at paras 68-70. 24 2002 SCC 26 . 25 Ibid at para 2. 26 2003 CanLII 30886 (ONCA) . 27 2008 SCC 51 . 28 Supra note 2......