R. v. Ramos, 2021 SCC 15

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Brown, Russell; Kasirer, Nicholas
Citation2021 SCC 15
Docket Number39466
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date21 April 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...to an ineffectiveness claim made on appeal was explained in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111 at paras 119-120, 457 DLR (4th) 372, affirmed 2021 SCC 15, 457 DLR (4th) 369. In Ramos, although there was a direct submission on appeal as to ineffectiveness of defence counsel, there was no affidavit evid......
  • R v Van Deventer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 Diciembre 2021
    ...attract. This requirement is well captured by the comments of Mainella J.A. in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, 457 DLR (4th) 372, aff’d 2021 SCC 15: [50] … Language is often open to “multiple interpretations or characterizations” (Gagnon [2006 SCC 17] at para 19).......
  • R v Bear,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 14 Enero 2022
    ...attract. This requirement is well captured by the comments of Mainella J.A. in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, 457 DLR (4th) 372, aff’d 2021 SCC 15: [50] … Language is often open to “multiple interpretations or characterizations” (Gagnon [2006 SCC 17] at para 19).......
  • R. v. Gibson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 23 Julio 2021
    ...presumption. The analysis is conducted without the benefit of hindsight. See R. v. Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, at paras. 119-20, aff’d 2021 SCC 15. The Principles [144]   I would not give effect to this ground of appeal. The Family Members [145]   The appellant says tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...to an ineffectiveness claim made on appeal was explained in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111 at paras 119-120, 457 DLR (4th) 372, affirmed 2021 SCC 15, 457 DLR (4th) 369. In Ramos, although there was a direct submission on appeal as to ineffectiveness of defence counsel, there was no affidavit evid......
  • R v Van Deventer,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 Diciembre 2021
    ...attract. This requirement is well captured by the comments of Mainella J.A. in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, 457 DLR (4th) 372, aff’d 2021 SCC 15: [50] … Language is often open to “multiple interpretations or characterizations” (Gagnon [2006 SCC 17] at para 19).......
  • R v Bear,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 14 Enero 2022
    ...attract. This requirement is well captured by the comments of Mainella J.A. in R v Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, 457 DLR (4th) 372, aff’d 2021 SCC 15: [50] … Language is often open to “multiple interpretations or characterizations” (Gagnon [2006 SCC 17] at para 19).......
  • R. v. Gibson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 23 Julio 2021
    ...presumption. The analysis is conducted without the benefit of hindsight. See R. v. Ramos, 2020 MBCA 111, at paras. 119-20, aff’d 2021 SCC 15. The Principles [144]   I would not give effect to this ground of appeal. The Family Members [145]   The appellant says tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT