R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Ryan-Froslie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit,The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 19 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 04 March 2020 |
| Docket Number | CACR3172 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
The Impact of the Charter
...Le discusses Therens in a way that implies that the accused’s submission is not required. In the context of rejecting the 63 R v Ratt , 2020 SKCA 19 at para 37. “Even briely” is a reference to an argument that has been used to counter the “no acquiescence” argument in some cases, that an ac......
-
Table of cases
...231 R v Rajaratnam, 2006 ABCA 333 ........................................................ 110, 114, 397 R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19 ................................................................................ 316–17 R v Reddy, 2007 BCPC 384 ........................................................
-
R v Julom,
...law detained at all prior to his ultimate physical arrest. [42] In R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19 at para 38, 387 CCC (3d) 1, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal relevantly observed in a case where the police officers had yelled at the person......
-
R v Abdulkadir,
...liberty. There was no violation of s. 9 of the Charter. They did not detain him. He did not stop. He ran. See Julom at para 33; R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19, Ryan-Froslie JA at paras 23, 36-38; Nesbeth at paras 14 and (ii) Profiling [106] If the evidence had di......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
R v Julom,
...law detained at all prior to his ultimate physical arrest. [42] In R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19 at para 38, 387 CCC (3d) 1, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal relevantly observed in a case where the police officers had yelled at the person......
-
R v Abdulkadir,
...liberty. There was no violation of s. 9 of the Charter. They did not detain him. He did not stop. He ran. See Julom at para 33; R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19, Ryan-Froslie JA at paras 23, 36-38; Nesbeth at paras 14 and (ii) Profiling [106] If the evidence had di......
-
Her Majesty the Queen v. Bert Brian Gamble, 2020 SKPC 34
...As indicated by Crown Counsel, a consideration of any detention must focus on the principles in R v Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19. Relying on R v Le, 2019 SCC 34, Justice Ryan Froslie indicates two stages of a s. 9 analysis: 1) Was there a detention; 2) Was the detention arbitrary. (R v Ra......
-
R. v. Green,
...[46] In its helpful analysis in R. v. Ratt, 2020 SKCA 19 the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal sought to reconcile the Supreme Court of Canada’s analysis in Le with the body of jurisprudence considering wh......