R. v. Reid (E.), 2016 ONCA 524
Judge | Juriansz, Watt and Roberts, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Case Date | December 17, 2015 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | 2016 ONCA 524;(2016), 351 O.A.C. 154 (CA) |
R. v. Reid (E.) (2016), 351 O.A.C. 154 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2016] O.A.C. TBEd. JN.038
Her Majesty the Queen (respondent) v. Erik Reid (appellant)
(C59670; 2016 ONCA 524)
Indexed As: R. v. Reid (E.)
Ontario Court of Appeal
Juriansz, Watt and Roberts, JJ.A.
June 30, 2016.
Summary:
About a week after two thefts of guns from storage lockers in Port Perry, the police arrested the accused on an unrelated and outstanding warrant. When searched incident to his arrest, he had several .22 calibre bullets in his pocket. The police obtained a warrant to search a storage locker leased to the accused. The core of the information to obtain (ITO) consisted of information provided by a confidential informant (CI) known to the Toronto Police Service. In the locker, police officers found 22 handguns, 13 long guns and over 5,000 rounds of ammunition. All of the handguns and six of the long guns came from the Port Perry storage lockers. The police obtained a second warrant to search the accused's home. Execution of that warrant yielded two more stolen handguns, more ammunition and various items belonging to the victims of one of the Port Perry locker thefts. The accused was charged with 98 firearms offences. The accused sought to exclude all of the evidence found in his storage locker and home. He challenged the issuance of the search warrant for his storage locker, invoking s. 8 of the Charter and asserting that under R. v. Garofoli et al. (1990, SCC), the warrant could not have been issued on the basis of the material included in the ITO. As part of his s. 8 application, the accused unsuccessfully sought leave to cross-examine the author of the ITO. The Crown acknowledged that the redacted ITO provided to defence counsel could not support the issuance of the warrant to search the locker. The Crown invoked step six of Garofoli and provided the trial judge with a draft summary of the redacted parts of the ITO. The trial judge reviewed the draft and provided it to defence counsel. The accused asserted that the summary was so devoid of information that he could not make any submissions on his Garofoli application.
The Ontario Superior Court was satisfied that the step six summary was adequate to permit the accused to make full answer and defence on his Garofoli application. The court relied on the redacted portions of the ITO and found that the warrant could have been issued in reliance upon them. The court dismissed the s. 8 application. The accused pleaded not guilty and agreed that findings of guilt could be recorded on one count of possession of a firearm for the purpose of trafficking, one count of possession of an unregistered firearm with ammunition readily accessible, and 35 counts of possession of unlicensed firearms.
The Ontario Superior Court found the accused guilty on the 37 counts as agreed to by the accused. The court concluded that an appropriate total sentence was 12 years' imprisonment reduced by 36 months for time spent pre-trial disposition custody. The accused appealed the conviction and sought leave to appeal the sentence. On the conviction appeal, the accused challenged, for the first time, the constitutional validity of step six of Garofoli which he asserted offended s. 7 of the Charter. Alternatively, he asserted that the judge erred in dismissing the Garofoli application at trial by relying on the ITO's redacted portions when the judicial summary provided to him, did not make him sufficiently aware of the nature of the excised material to permit him to effectively challenge it.
The Ontario Court of Appeal refused to determine the s. 7 Charter argument as it was raised for the first time on appeal. The court dismissed the alternative ground and dismissed the conviction appeal. The court granted leave to appeal the sentence. The court affirmed the sentence of 12 years' imprisonment. The parties agreed that the trial judge should have awarded the entire 31.5 months of pre-disposition custody at a rate of 1.5:1 to give effect to R. v. Summers (2014 SCC). The court applied the Summers principles and reduced the net sentence by 11 months, to eight years and one month.
Civil Rights - Topic 3133
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Right of accused to make full answer and defence - See paragraphs 77 to 96.
Criminal Law - Topic 3099
Special powers - Issue of search warrants - Confidentiality of supporting material - See paragraphs 77 to 96.
Criminal Law - Topic 3113
Special powers - Setting aside search warrants - General - Scope of review - See paragraphs 73 to 76.
Criminal Law - Topic 3118
Special powers - Setting aside search warrants - General - Evidence (incl. amplification evidence) - See paragraphs 51 to 96.
Criminal Law - Topic 4505
Procedure - Trial - Special duties of Crown - Duty to disclose evidence prior to trial - See paragraphs 51 to 96.
Criminal Law - Topic 4853
Appeals - Indictable offences - Grounds of appeal - Grounds raised for the first time on appeal - See paragraphs 26 to 50.
Criminal Law - Topic 5848.2
Sentencing - Considerations on imposing sentence - Time already served - See paragraph 103.
Criminal Law - Topic 5871
Sentence - Possession and use or sale of weapons or ammunition - See paragraphs 97 to 103.
Evidence - Topic 4150
Witnesses - Privilege - Privileged topics - Identity of police informants - See paragraphs 77 to 96.
Counsel:
John Norris, Breese Davies and Owen Goddard, for the appellant;
Alexander Hrybinsky, for the respondent.
These appeals were heard on December 17, 2015, by Juriansz, Watt and Roberts, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. Watt, J.A., released the following judgment for the court on June 30, 2016.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
...R. v. Parmar et al. (1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 132 (Ont. H.C.), Eastside Pharmacy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 2019 BCCA 60, Letourneau v. Ottawa Bronson Construction Ltd. et al., [1970] 1 O.R. 24, Bonello v. Gores Landing Marina (1986) Ltd., 2017 ONCA......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 9, 2022 ' May 13, 2022)
...ss. 2(b), 7, 12 and 15(1), Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137.1, 140, Veneruzzo v. Storey, 2018 ONCA 688, R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524 Rieder zu Wallburg v. Plista Gmbh, 2022 ONCA 386 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Costs, Partial Indemnity Drop and Run Inc. v. 1909703 Ontario Inc.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
...R. v. Parmar et al. (1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 132 (Ont. H.C.), Eastside Pharmacy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 2019 BCCA 60, Letourneau v. Ottawa Bronson Construction Ltd. et al., [1970] 1 O.R. 24, Bonello v. Gores Landing Marina (1986) Ltd., 2017 ONCA......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 10-14)
...Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss.10(b) and 24(2), Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19, ss.7(1) and 5(2), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, R. v. Pino, 2016 ONCA 389, R. v. Plaha (2004), 188 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Goldhart (1996), 107 C.C.C (3d) 481 (SCC), R. v. Lenh......
-
R. v. Persaud, 2016 ONSC 8110
...273-274. (emphasis of original) See also: Quebec (Attorney-General) v. Laroche (2002), 169 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (SCC), at p. 188; R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, at para. 73 (appln for leave to appeal filed [2016] S.C.C.A. No. 432); R. v. Nero and Caputo, 2016 ONCA 160, at paras. 70-72, 79, 82, 84, 8......
-
R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
...court to balance the interests of justice as they affect all parties: Kaiman v Graham, 2009 ONCA 77 at para 18, 245 OAC 130; R v Reid, 2016 ONCA 524 at para 44, 338 CCC (3d) 47, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2017 CanLII 5367; Quan v Cusson, 2009 SCC 62 at paras 38–44, [2009] 3 SCR 712. ......
-
Kupsar v Regina Provincial Correctional Centre,
...v McVeigh, 2018 SKCA 76 at paras 131–132, 428 DLR (4th) 122. However, the general rule is just that. As Watt J.A. commented in R v Reid, 2016 ONCA 524 at para 38, 338 CCC (3d) 47, this rule is “preclusive but not unyielding”. In R v Ahmed, 2019 SKCA 47, [2019] 10 WWR 99, the Court described......
-
R v Yates,
...the alternative, Mr. Yates goes on to analogize his situation to that of a new argument on appeal and points to the decision in R v Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 338 CCC (3d) 47, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2017 CanLII 5367, as providing the appropriate framework to assess whether an argument of......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
...R. v. Parmar et al. (1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 132 (Ont. H.C.), Eastside Pharmacy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 2019 BCCA 60, Letourneau v. Ottawa Bronson Construction Ltd. et al., [1970] 1 O.R. 24, Bonello v. Gores Landing Marina (1986) Ltd., 2017 ONCA......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 9, 2022 ' May 13, 2022)
...ss. 2(b), 7, 12 and 15(1), Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 137.1, 140, Veneruzzo v. Storey, 2018 ONCA 688, R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524 Rieder zu Wallburg v. Plista Gmbh, 2022 ONCA 386 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Costs, Partial Indemnity Drop and Run Inc. v. 1909703 Ontario Inc.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 10-14)
...Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss.10(b) and 24(2), Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19, ss.7(1) and 5(2), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, R. v. Pino, 2016 ONCA 389, R. v. Plaha (2004), 188 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Goldhart (1996), 107 C.C.C (3d) 481 (SCC), R. v. Lenh......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
...R. v. Parmar et al. (1987), 61 O.R. (2d) 132 (Ont. H.C.), Eastside Pharmacy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Minister of Health), R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 2019 BCCA 60, Letourneau v. Ottawa Bronson Construction Ltd. et al., [1970] 1 O.R. 24, Bonello v. Gores Landing Marina (1986) Ltd., 2017 ONCA......
-
Table of Cases
...R v Reid, 2012 NLTD(G) 10 ......................................................................... 181, 183 R v Reid, 2016 ONCA 524 ...................................................................................84 R v Reimer (1987), 47 Man R (2d) 156 (CA).....................................
-
Low Hanging Fruit . . . and Beyond: Canada's Drug Laws Meet the Charter
...1461. See also R v Learning , 2010 ONSC 3816; R v Blake , 2010 ONCA 1; R v Crevier , 2015 ONCA 619; R v Rocha , 2012 ONCA 707; R v Reid , 2016 ONCA 524 at paras 84–86; leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2017 CanLII 5367 (SCC). 536 Melvyn Green the Crown’s case frequently depends on the admiss......
-
Table of Cases
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1984] SCCA No 107 .............................................................517, 518, 528 R v Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2017 CanLII 5367 (SCC) ...........................................................................................
-
Review of Warrants
...as to how to approach such applications: see, for example, R v Crevier , 2015 ONCA 619 at paras 82–90 and 104–12, and R v Reid , 2016 ONCA 524 at paras 84–96. 9. WAS THE CONDUCT OF THE POLICE IN SEEKING THE WARRANT SUBVERSIVE OF THE PROCESS? As noted earlier, the fact that false or misleadi......