R. v. Riley, 2019 NSCA 94

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeBeveridge, Scanlan and Bourgeois, JJ.A.
Citation2019 NSCA 94
Docket NumberCAC 475857
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Date05 December 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...burden of proof to him. He need only raise a reasonable doubt, taking all the evidence (and lack of evidence) into account: see R v Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, Scanlan JA (dissenting), revd 2020 SCC 31 (appeal allowed for reasons of Scanlan JA) at paras 137, 143, 165; see also R v Ryan, 2014 ABCA ......
  • R. v. Greenwood,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...going forward and looking back at the kind of thing you should be looking for. [Emphasis added.] [136]    In R. v. Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, Scanlan J.A.’s dissent was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada (2020 SCC 31).  In his reasons, Scanlan J.A. distinguished betw......
  • R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 19, 2021
    ...parts of the evidence. [107] In support of his submission, counsel places heavy reliance on the dissent of Scanlan J.A. in R. v. Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, at paras. 138, 144. In allowing the appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously adopted the dissent: 2020 SCC (c) Analysis [108] Mr. Palm......
  • R. v. Riley, 2020 SCC 31
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...Appelant - et - Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée JUDGMENT The appeal from the judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Number CAC 475857, 2019 NSCA 94, dated December 5, 2019, was heard on November 3, 2020, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally: Karakatsanis J. — ......
4 cases
  • R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 4, 2020
    ...burden of proof to him. He need only raise a reasonable doubt, taking all the evidence (and lack of evidence) into account: see R v Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, Scanlan JA (dissenting), revd 2020 SCC 31 (appeal allowed for reasons of Scanlan JA) at paras 137, 143, 165; see also R v Ryan, 2014 ABCA ......
  • R. v. Greenwood,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 26, 2022
    ...going forward and looking back at the kind of thing you should be looking for. [Emphasis added.] [136]    In R. v. Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, Scanlan J.A.’s dissent was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada (2020 SCC 31).  In his reasons, Scanlan J.A. distinguished betw......
  • R. v. Dadollahi-Sarab,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 19, 2021
    ...parts of the evidence. [107] In support of his submission, counsel places heavy reliance on the dissent of Scanlan J.A. in R. v. Riley, 2019 NSCA 94, at paras. 138, 144. In allowing the appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously adopted the dissent: 2020 SCC (c) Analysis [108] Mr. Palm......
  • R. v. Riley, 2020 SCC 31
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...Appelant - et - Sa Majesté la Reine Intimée JUDGMENT The appeal from the judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Number CAC 475857, 2019 NSCA 94, dated December 5, 2019, was heard on November 3, 2020, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally: Karakatsanis J. — ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT