R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 65 |
| Date | 26 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45101 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
...2015 SCC 15; [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773 (hypothetical offender: possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm); The Queen v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 (hypothetical offender: possession of a restricted firearm obtained through the commission of an offence); The Queen v. Smickle, 2013 ONCA ......
-
R. v. Coban,
...“consecutive sentences can be imposed when the offences committed protect different societal interests”: R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 at para. 91. [137] I am satisfied that within-indictment consecutive sentences are appropriate in this case, except wit......
-
R. v. Anderson, 2020 BCCA 297
...(Alta. C.A.). [82] This Court, most recently, considered the imposition of consecutive versus concurrent sentences in R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 at paras. 90 and 91: [90] The test for determining whether concurrent or consecutive sentences are appropriate is “whether the acts constitutin......
-
R. v. Olson,
...it must be adjusted. [100] On the subject of concurrent sentences, the Court of Appeal said in R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65: The test for determining whether concurrent or consecutive sentences are appropriate is “whether the acts constituting the offences we......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
...2015 SCC 15; [2015] 1 S.C.R. 773 (hypothetical offender: possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm); The Queen v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 (hypothetical offender: possession of a restricted firearm obtained through the commission of an offence); The Queen v. Smickle, 2013 ONCA ......
-
R. v. Coban,
...“consecutive sentences can be imposed when the offences committed protect different societal interests”: R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 at para. 91. [137] I am satisfied that within-indictment consecutive sentences are appropriate in this case, except wit......
-
R. v. Anderson, 2020 BCCA 297
...(Alta. C.A.). [82] This Court, most recently, considered the imposition of consecutive versus concurrent sentences in R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65 at paras. 90 and 91: [90] The test for determining whether concurrent or consecutive sentences are appropriate is “whether the acts constitutin......
-
R. v. Olson,
...it must be adjusted. [100] On the subject of concurrent sentences, the Court of Appeal said in R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65: The test for determining whether concurrent or consecutive sentences are appropriate is “whether the acts constituting the offences we......
Request a trial to view additional results