R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol
Citation2020 ABCA 361
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date15 October 2020
Docket Number1803-0127-A
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2022
    ...that would have been available to the defence if the relevant information had been disclosed:” Dixon at para 36; see R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at paras 47, 56; Blanchard at para 24; Vallee at paras 54, 59. According to Justice Cory in Dixon at para 35, “where the remedy soug......
  • R v RV,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Junio 2022
    ...obligation to disclose, and the test for a mistrial, raise issues of law which are reviewed for correctness”: R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at para 26. “The trial judge’s assessment of issues such as whether disclosure . . . would have had any effect on the outcome of the......
  • R v Wollach,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Marzo 2022
    ...is a question of mixed fact and law and is entitled to deference, as is the ultimate decision to grant or deny a mistrial: R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at para [24]        Findings of fact and credibility are entitled to deference on appeal unless they are ......
  • JJ (Re),
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Octubre 2022
    ...In the context of a criminal case, the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 stated at para 47: [47] ... Where disclosure problems arise early in the prosecution, the appropriate remedy may be an order for production, or an adjournment. Where those remedies are no longer ef......
4 cases
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2022
    ...that would have been available to the defence if the relevant information had been disclosed:” Dixon at para 36; see R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at paras 47, 56; Blanchard at para 24; Vallee at paras 54, 59. According to Justice Cory in Dixon at para 35, “where the remedy soug......
  • R v RV,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Junio 2022
    ...obligation to disclose, and the test for a mistrial, raise issues of law which are reviewed for correctness”: R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at para 26. “The trial judge’s assessment of issues such as whether disclosure . . . would have had any effect on the outcome of the......
  • R v Wollach,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Marzo 2022
    ...is a question of mixed fact and law and is entitled to deference, as is the ultimate decision to grant or deny a mistrial: R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 at para [24]        Findings of fact and credibility are entitled to deference on appeal unless they are ......
  • JJ (Re),
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Octubre 2022
    ...In the context of a criminal case, the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Robinson, 2020 ABCA 361 stated at para 47: [47] ... Where disclosure problems arise early in the prosecution, the appropriate remedy may be an order for production, or an adjournment. Where those remedies are no longer ef......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT