R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeGroberman,Fenlon,Fitch
Citation2019 BCCA 68
Docket NumberCA44272
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Date26 February 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. T.L.P.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 29 Enero 2021
    ...its curative power to dismiss an appeal in cases analogous to the one at bar: R. v. Malakpour, 2018 BCCA 254 at paras. 98–99; R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68 at paras. 84–90; R. v. Awasis, 2020 BCCA 23 at paras. [77] To determine whether a “Boutilier error” was committed in the case at bar, close......
  • R. v. Lawrence, 2019 BCCA 291
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 6 Agosto 2019
    ...the impact of Boutilier on sentences imposed pre-Boutilier on several occasions, including R. v. Malakpour, 2018 BCCA 254 and R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68. In both of these cases this court upheld the designation using the curative proviso even though the judge had not considered the treatment......
  • R. v. Boalag, 2020 NLCA 33
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Newfoundland)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...has resulted in no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. See also:  R. v. C.W., 2019 ONCA 976, at paragraph 34; R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68, paragraphs 84 and [25]         In this case, the trial judge referenced the issue of risk at the des......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Agosto 2020
    ...As the Crown notes, an example of the application of s. 669.2 of the Code is found in R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68. That matter involved a trial and guilty plea before Justice Dickson (as she then was) and a later application to declare Mr. Roper a dangerous offender. Justice Di......
4 cases
  • R. v. T.L.P.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 29 Enero 2021
    ...its curative power to dismiss an appeal in cases analogous to the one at bar: R. v. Malakpour, 2018 BCCA 254 at paras. 98–99; R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68 at paras. 84–90; R. v. Awasis, 2020 BCCA 23 at paras. [77] To determine whether a “Boutilier error” was committed in the case at bar, close......
  • R. v. Lawrence, 2019 BCCA 291
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 6 Agosto 2019
    ...the impact of Boutilier on sentences imposed pre-Boutilier on several occasions, including R. v. Malakpour, 2018 BCCA 254 and R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68. In both of these cases this court upheld the designation using the curative proviso even though the judge had not considered the treatment......
  • R. v. Boalag, 2020 NLCA 33
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Newfoundland)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...has resulted in no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. See also:  R. v. C.W., 2019 ONCA 976, at paragraph 34; R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68, paragraphs 84 and [25]         In this case, the trial judge referenced the issue of risk at the des......
  • Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 31 Agosto 2020
    ...As the Crown notes, an example of the application of s. 669.2 of the Code is found in R. v. Roper, 2019 BCCA 68. That matter involved a trial and guilty plea before Justice Dickson (as she then was) and a later application to declare Mr. Roper a dangerous offender. Justice Di......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT