R v Ross, 2020 ABPC 84
Judge | Honourable Judge J.N. LeGrandeur |
Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | May 06, 2020 |
Jurisdiction | Alberta |
Citations | 2020 ABPC 84 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Kelln,
...the driver is impaired by alcohol, and there must exist reasonable grounds for the belief. (See R v Straiton-Garty, 2020 NSPC 7; R v Ross, 2020 ABPC 84; and R v Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35, [2009] 2 SCR [72] In Gunn, Caldwell, J.A. thoroughly discussed reasonable and probable grounds (now referre......
-
R. v. Nogue,
...the conveyance in motion (see R. v. George (1994), 120 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 237 (N.L.C.A.) and R. v. Ross, 2020 ABPC 84, at paragraph 69). If the accused rebuts the presumption, then the Crown must prove care or control without the benefit of the presumption (what i......
2 cases
-
R. v. Kelln,
...the driver is impaired by alcohol, and there must exist reasonable grounds for the belief. (See R v Straiton-Garty, 2020 NSPC 7; R v Ross, 2020 ABPC 84; and R v Shepherd, 2009 SCC 35, [2009] 2 SCR [72] In Gunn, Caldwell, J.A. thoroughly discussed reasonable and probable grounds (now referre......
-
R. v. Nogue,
...the conveyance in motion (see R. v. George (1994), 120 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 237 (N.L.C.A.) and R. v. Ross, 2020 ABPC 84, at paragraph 69). If the accused rebuts the presumption, then the Crown must prove care or control without the benefit of the presumption (what i......