R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris; The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon; The Honourable Madam Justice DeWitt‑Van Oosten |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | August 27, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCCA 240 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
57 practice notes
-
R. v. Kruk, 2024 SCC 7
... Overruled: R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240, 66 C.R. (7th) 107 ; R. v. Perkins, 2007 ONCA 585 , 223 C.C.C. (3d) 289 ; R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541 , 376 C.C.C. (3d) 286 ; R. v. J.C......
-
Figg v. R,
... In R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1333 (QL), the accused argued the trial judge had scrutinized the defence evidence more rigorously than the evidence of the Crown. Consent was the main issue at trial. The judg......
-
R. v. Cooke, 2020 NSCA 66
...Laframboise v. Millington, 2019 NSCA 43; R. v. N.M., 2019 NSCA 4; R. v. J.C., 2018 NSCA 72; R. v. G.E.H., 2012 NSCA 69; R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Laing, 2017 NSCA 69; R. v. Alisaleh, 2020 ONCA 597; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; Cr......
-
R. v. Vallee,
...findings. Uneven scrutiny is, however, a doctrine that has been applied or considered by this and other appellate courts: R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42; R. v. Aird, 2013 ONCA 447; R. v. Kiss, 2018 ONCA 184; R. v. Wanihadie, 2019 ABCA 402; R. v. Willis, 2019 NSCA [242......
Request a trial to view additional results
54 cases
-
Figg v. R,
... In R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240, [2020] B.C.J. No. 1333 (QL), the accused argued the trial judge had scrutinized the defence evidence more rigorously than the evidence of the Crown. Consent was the main issue at trial. The judg......
-
R. v. Cooke, 2020 NSCA 66
...Laframboise v. Millington, 2019 NSCA 43; R. v. N.M., 2019 NSCA 4; R. v. J.C., 2018 NSCA 72; R. v. G.E.H., 2012 NSCA 69; R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Laing, 2017 NSCA 69; R. v. Alisaleh, 2020 ONCA 597; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; Cr......
-
R. v. Vallee,
...findings. Uneven scrutiny is, however, a doctrine that has been applied or considered by this and other appellate courts: R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42; R. v. Aird, 2013 ONCA 447; R. v. Kiss, 2018 ONCA 184; R. v. Wanihadie, 2019 ABCA 402; R. v. Willis, 2019 NSCA [242......
-
Mountainstar Gold Inc. v. British Columbia Securities Commission,
...of treating and assessing evidence, as between parties.” There is authority to similar effect in this jurisdiction: R. v. Roth, 2020 BCCA 240. [84] In Roth, this Court set out the legal principles underlying “uneven scrutiny” as a gro......
Request a trial to view additional results