R. v. Sacobie, (1979) 27 N.B.R.(2d) 232 (PC)

JudgeHarper, J.
CourtProvincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
Case DateOctober 04, 1979
JurisdictionNew Brunswick
Citations(1979), 27 N.B.R.(2d) 232 (PC)

R. v. Sacobie (1979), 27 N.B.R.(2d) 232 (PC);

    27 R.N.-B.(2e) 232; 60 A.P.R. 232

MLB headnote and full text

Sommaire et texte intégral

R. v. Sacobie and Paul

Indexed As: R. v. Sacobie and Paul

Répertorié: R. v. Sacobie and Paul

New Brunswick Provincial Court

Harper, J.

October 4, 1979.

Summary:

Résumé:

This headnote contains no summary.

Constitutional Law - Topic 4846

Peace, order and good government - Enforcement of Federal statutes - Prosecution under non-criminal statutes - Fisheries Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. F-14 - The Attorney General for the Province of New Brunswick brought an information against the accused for a violation of the Fisheries Act - The accused challenged the authority of the Attorney General to proceed - The New Brunswick Provincial Court dismissed the information against the accused on the ground that only the Attorney General of Canada could prosecute violations of the Fisheries Act, a non-criminal federal statute, following R. v. Hauser (1979), 26 N.R. 541; 16 A.R. 91; 8 C.R.(3d) 89.

Constitutional Law - Topic 6444

Enumeration in s. 91 of British North America Act - Criminal law - Matters not criminal in nature - Fisheries Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. F-14 - The New Brunswick Provincial Court held that the Fisheries Act was not criminal legislation within the meaning of s. 91(27) of the British North America Act.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Hauser (1979), 26 N.R. 541; 16 A.R. 91; 8 C.R.(3rd) 89, appld. [para. 1].

R. v. Stevenson (1979), 26 N.B.R.(2d) 581; 55 A.P.R. 581, not folld. [para. 4].

R. v. Miller (1975), 30 C.R.N.S. 372, ref'd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Doyle (1976), 9 N.R. 285; 68 D.L.R.(3d) 270; 35 C.R.N.S. 1; [1977] 1 S.C.R. 597; 29 C.C.C.(2d) 177, consd. [para. 15].

Statutes Noticed:

Fisheries Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. F-14.

Counsel:

Robert Murray, for the Attorney General of New Brunswick;

J. Brian Neill, for the defendants.

This case was heard at Fredericton, N.B., before HARPER, J., of the New Brunswick Provincial Court, who delivered the following judgment on October 4, 1979:

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Sacobie and Paul, (1979) 28 N.B.R.(2d) 288 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 11 December 1979
    ...whereby he dismissed an information on a preliminary objection that the prosecutor had no jurisdiction to conduct the prosecution. [See 27 N.B.R.(2d) 232; 60 A.P.R. 232.] [2] The facts stated in this case are that a fisheries officer, acting under the authority of the Fisheries Act, R.S.C. ......
1 cases
  • R. v. Sacobie and Paul, (1979) 28 N.B.R.(2d) 288 (CA)
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 11 December 1979
    ...whereby he dismissed an information on a preliminary objection that the prosecutor had no jurisdiction to conduct the prosecution. [See 27 N.B.R.(2d) 232; 60 A.P.R. 232.] [2] The facts stated in this case are that a fisheries officer, acting under the authority of the Fisheries Act, R.S.C. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT