R. v. Saddleback
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Richard Wagner; Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Sheilah Martin; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin; Mary Moreau |
| Citation | 2026 SCC 18 |
| Docket Number | 41567 |
| Date | 22 May 2026 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Knight
...93 Hearsay evidence and Mr. Big confessions are presumptively inadmissible: Bradshaw, at para. 1; Khelawon, at para. 48; R. v. Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18, at para. 20; R. v. Lako, 2025 ONCA 284, 176 O.R. (3d) 321, at para. 43; and R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 544, at paras. 10, 85.......
-
R. v. Moylett
...Counsel for the Respondent: Dana E. Sullivan Authorities Cited: CASES CITED: R. v. Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18; R. v. R.V., 2019 SCC 41, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 237; R. v. Hoyles, 2015 NLCA 26; R. v. Bouvette, 2025 SCC STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code, RSC 1985, ......
-
Governors of the University of Alberta v. Alberta (Minister of Justice)
...and posts solely for the fact that they were made, but also for the implied assertions therein: R v Saddleback, 2024 ABCA 352, aff’d 2026 SCC 18 [Saddleback]. Only if one accepts the negative implications about Yaroslav found in the attachments can they conclude that being associated with h......
-
R. v. Yatchotay
...record and the submissions of the parties, are unintelligible or otherwise frustrate appellate review: GF at paras 68-79; R v Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18 at para 23. As a result, this ground of appeal is [25] The appeal is dismissed. [26] &nbs......
4 cases
-
R v Knight
...93 Hearsay evidence and Mr. Big confessions are presumptively inadmissible: Bradshaw, at para. 1; Khelawon, at para. 48; R. v. Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18, at para. 20; R. v. Lako, 2025 ONCA 284, 176 O.R. (3d) 321, at para. 43; and R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 544, at paras. 10, 85.......
-
R. v. Moylett
...Counsel for the Respondent: Dana E. Sullivan Authorities Cited: CASES CITED: R. v. Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18; R. v. R.V., 2019 SCC 41, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 237; R. v. Hoyles, 2015 NLCA 26; R. v. Bouvette, 2025 SCC STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code, RSC 1985, ......
-
Governors of the University of Alberta v. Alberta (Minister of Justice)
...and posts solely for the fact that they were made, but also for the implied assertions therein: R v Saddleback, 2024 ABCA 352, aff’d 2026 SCC 18 [Saddleback]. Only if one accepts the negative implications about Yaroslav found in the attachments can they conclude that being associated with h......
-
R. v. Yatchotay
...record and the submissions of the parties, are unintelligible or otherwise frustrate appellate review: GF at paras 68-79; R v Saddleback, 2026 SCC 18 at para 23. As a result, this ground of appeal is [25] The appeal is dismissed. [26] &nbs......
