R. v. Saunders,
Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
Judge | Honourable Judge A.A. Fradsham |
Neutral Citation | 2021 ABPC 77 |
Citation | 2021 ABPC 77 |
Docket Number | 190400085P1 |
Date | 05 March 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 ABPC 49,
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
R v Mohamed,
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
2 cases
-
2023 ABPC 49,
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
R v Mohamed,
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......