R. v. Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77
| Judge | Honourable Judge A.A. Fradsham |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABPC 77 |
| Date | 05 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | 190400085P1 |
| Citation | 2021 ABPC 77 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
2023 ABPC 49
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
R v Mohamed
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
2025 ABCJ 219
...promptly as the Charter requires is a highly contextual inquiry and depends on the circumstances surrounding the detention ( R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77 at para 81). The circumstances may require an officer to delay giving reasons for detention for their own safety or to gain control of the ......
-
R v Castillo
...promptly as the Charter requires is a highly contextual inquiry and depends on the circumstances surrounding the detention ( R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77 at para 81). The circumstances may require an officer to delay giving reasons for detention for their own safety or to gain control of the ......
4 cases
-
2023 ABPC 49
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
R v Mohamed
...driving. It is simple, once the police officer decides to undertake such an investigation, he must tell the detainee. 128 In R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court held that to determine whether a section 10(a) delay is unreasonable, a trial judge must ex......
-
2025 ABCJ 219
...promptly as the Charter requires is a highly contextual inquiry and depends on the circumstances surrounding the detention ( R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77 at para 81). The circumstances may require an officer to delay giving reasons for detention for their own safety or to gain control of the ......
-
R v Castillo
...promptly as the Charter requires is a highly contextual inquiry and depends on the circumstances surrounding the detention ( R v Saunders, 2021 ABPC 77 at para 81). The circumstances may require an officer to delay giving reasons for detention for their own safety or to gain control of the ......