R v Schaff,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit,The Honourable Madam Justice Jackson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell |
| Citation | 2017 SKCA 103 |
| Date | 05 December 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR2841 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Digest: R v Prokopchuk, 2018 SKQB 184
...(3d) 326, 36 CR (6th) 200 R v Rahimi, 2015 SKCA 85, [2015] 12 WWR 436, 327 CCC (3d) 234 R v Sandhu (1989), 50 CCC (3d) 492 R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103, 142 WCB (2d) 803 R v Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 SCR 144, 147 CCC (3d) 449, 36 CR (5th) 1 R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 SCR 455 ......
-
R v Kishayinew,
...that the verdict is unreasonable (R v Burke, [1996] 1 SCR 474 at paras 2 to 7 and 46 [Burke], Patrick at paras 24 and 67, R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at paras 21 and 44 [Schaff], R v Perrone, 2014 MBCA 74 at para 4, 313 CCC (3d) 399 [Perrone] (aff’d 2015 SCC 8, [2015] 1 SCR 473), and R v Huss......
-
R v Wolff,
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. Rouse,
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
Get Started for Free
11 cases
-
R v Kishayinew,
...that the verdict is unreasonable (R v Burke, [1996] 1 SCR 474 at paras 2 to 7 and 46 [Burke], Patrick at paras 24 and 67, R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at paras 21 and 44 [Schaff], R v Perrone, 2014 MBCA 74 at para 4, 313 CCC (3d) 399 [Perrone] (aff’d 2015 SCC 8, [2015] 1 SCR 473), and R v Huss......
-
R v Wolff,
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. Rouse,
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. PROKOPCHUK,
...It is the substance, not the form, that is important: R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15 at para 14, [2010] 1 SCR 455; also R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103. [73] Credibility is a trial issue which, itself, is subject to reasonable doubt and an accused is entitled to the benefit of reasonable doubt r......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: R v Prokopchuk, 2018 SKQB 184
...(3d) 326, 36 CR (6th) 200 R v Rahimi, 2015 SKCA 85, [2015] 12 WWR 436, 327 CCC (3d) 234 R v Sandhu (1989), 50 CCC (3d) 492 R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103, 142 WCB (2d) 803 R v Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 SCR 144, 147 CCC (3d) 449, 36 CR (5th) 1 R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 SCR 455 ......