R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit,The Honourable Madam Justice Jackson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Caldwell |
| Citation | 2017 SKCA 103 |
| Date | 05 December 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACR2841 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Digest: R v Prokopchuk, 2018 SKQB 184
...(3d) 326, 36 CR (6th) 200 R v Rahimi, 2015 SKCA 85, [2015] 12 WWR 436, 327 CCC (3d) 234 R v Sandhu (1989), 50 CCC (3d) 492 R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103, 142 WCB (2d) 803 R v Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 SCR 144, 147 CCC (3d) 449, 36 CR (5th) 1 R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 SCR 455 ......
-
R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. PROKOPCHUK, 2018 SKQB 184
...It is the substance, not the form, that is important: R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15 at para 14, [2010] 1 SCR 455; also R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103. [73] Credibility is a trial issue which, itself, is subject to reasonable doubt and an accused is entitled to the benefit of reasonable doubt r......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. Rouse, 2020 NSCA 8
...MVR (7th) 1. Findings of reliability are also factual determinations and subject to the same deferential standard of review: R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para 44; R v Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8 at para 17, [2019] 6 WWR [41] This is not to say that an error in a trial judge’s assessment of the evid......
-
R. v. PROKOPCHUK, 2018 SKQB 184
...It is the substance, not the form, that is important: R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15 at para 14, [2010] 1 SCR 455; also R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103. [73] Credibility is a trial issue which, itself, is subject to reasonable doubt and an accused is entitled to the benefit of reasonable doubt r......
-
R. v. Plehanov, 2019 BCCA 462
...(3d) 500, which Justice Karakatsanis adopted in allowing a subsequent appeal: 2013 SCC 4, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 54. See also: R. v. Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103 at para. [55] In my view, the trial judge was alive to the issues of F’s credibility and reliability, “grappled” with those issues, and explain......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: R v Prokopchuk, 2018 SKQB 184
...(3d) 326, 36 CR (6th) 200 R v Rahimi, 2015 SKCA 85, [2015] 12 WWR 436, 327 CCC (3d) 234 R v Sandhu (1989), 50 CCC (3d) 492 R v Schaff, 2017 SKCA 103, 142 WCB (2d) 803 R v Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 SCR 144, 147 CCC (3d) 449, 36 CR (5th) 1 R v Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 SCR 455 ......