R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud
Citation2022 SCC 34
Docket Number39559
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date07 October 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 practice notes
  • R. v. R.G.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...The Supreme Court recently addressed the framework for the admissibility of evidence in R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34. The framework is the same regardless of whether the issue is similar fact, discreditable conduct, hearsay and so on. [25]       The C......
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2022
    ...falling within traditional exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as spontaneous utterances, are presumptively admissible: R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34, at para. 51; R. v. Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, at para. 212; and R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260, 145 O.R. (3d) 241, at para. 6......
  • R v Kebede,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 4, 2022
    ...it would be otherwise.”  Relevance can only be fully assessed in the context of the other evidence at trial: R v Schneider, 2022 SCC 34 at para 40, citing R v Blackman, 2008 SCC 37 at para [61]             Evidence is a......
  • 2023 ONCA 3,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the airport intercept statement as an admission by Ms. Merritt of her guilt in Caleb's killing. As Rowe J. noted in R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34, at para. 81, “juries are likely to give significant weight to confession-like evidence” and he noted that there is therefore &......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • R. v. R.G.S.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...The Supreme Court recently addressed the framework for the admissibility of evidence in R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34. The framework is the same regardless of whether the issue is similar fact, discreditable conduct, hearsay and so on. [25]       The C......
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2022
    ...falling within traditional exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as spontaneous utterances, are presumptively admissible: R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34, at para. 51; R. v. Starr, 2000 SCC 40, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, at para. 212; and R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260, 145 O.R. (3d) 241, at para. 6......
  • R v Kebede,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 4, 2022
    ...it would be otherwise.”  Relevance can only be fully assessed in the context of the other evidence at trial: R v Schneider, 2022 SCC 34 at para 40, citing R v Blackman, 2008 SCC 37 at para [61]             Evidence is a......
  • 2023 ONCA 3,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...the airport intercept statement as an admission by Ms. Merritt of her guilt in Caleb's killing. As Rowe J. noted in R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34, at para. 81, “juries are likely to give significant weight to confession-like evidence” and he noted that there is therefore &......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT