R. v. Schneider,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud
Citation2022 SCC 34
Docket Number39559
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date07 October 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
50 practice notes
  • R. v. T.J.F.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Noviembre 2024
    ...3; R. v. Robertson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 918; R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Watson (1996), 50 C.R. (4th) 245; R. v. Handy, 2002 SCC 56, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; R. v. B. (C.R.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717; R. v. D. (L.E.),......
  • R v T.J.F.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Noviembre 2024
    ...3; R. v. Robertson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 918; R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Watson (1996), 50 C.R. (4th) 245; R. v. Handy, 2002 SCC 56, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; R. v. B. (C.R.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717; R. v. D. (L.E.),......
  • R. v. T.W.W.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2024
    ...168 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 W.W.R. 207; R. v. T. (M.), 2012 ONCA 511, 289 C.C.C. (3d) 115; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 581; R. v. Clayton, 2021 BCCA 24, 399 C.C.C. (3d) 283; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. D......
  • Grandel v Government of Saskatchewan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 Mayo 2024
    ...to admit them for the truth of their contents under the party admission exception to the hearsay rule (see, for example: R v Schneider, 2022 SCC 34 at paras 52–57, 418 CCC (3d) 137; and J.L. at para 107), and to find that they were evidence of Ms. Grandel's state of mind. The same is true o......
  • Get Started for Free
65 cases
  • R v T.J.F.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Noviembre 2024
    ...3; R. v. Robertson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 918; R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Watson (1996), 50 C.R. (4th) 245; R. v. Handy, 2002 SCC 56, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; R. v. B. (C.R.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717; R. v. D. (L.E.),......
  • R. v. T.W.W.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2024
    ...168 O.R. (3d) 575; R. v. Graham, 2019 SKCA 63, [2019] 12 W.W.R. 207; R. v. T. (M.), 2012 ONCA 511, 289 C.C.C. (3d) 115; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 581; R. v. Clayton, 2021 BCCA 24, 399 C.C.C. (3d) 283; R. v. Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577; R. v. D......
  • R. v. T.J.F.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 15 Noviembre 2024
    ...3; R. v. Robertson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 918; R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339; R. v. White, 2011 SCC 13, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Schneider, 2022 SCC 34; R. v. Watson (1996), 50 C.R. (4th) 245; R. v. Handy, 2002 SCC 56, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908; R. v. B. (C.R.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 717; R. v. D. (L.E.),......
  • Grandel v Government of Saskatchewan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 Mayo 2024
    ...to admit them for the truth of their contents under the party admission exception to the hearsay rule (see, for example: R v Schneider, 2022 SCC 34 at paras 52–57, 418 CCC (3d) 137; and J.L. at para 107), and to find that they were evidence of Ms. Grandel's state of mind. The same is true o......
  • Get Started for Free