R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407

JudgeMarina Paperny,Barbara Lea Veldhuis,Michelle Crighton
Citation2018 ABCA 407
Docket Number1703-0204-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date03 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...27; R v CKK, 2020 ABCA 145 at para 14, 386 CCC (3d) 391; R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13, [2018] AJ No 448 (QL) and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, [2018] AJ No 1432 (QL). [84]        Sauverwald noted (also in the context of assessing whether t......
  • R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...is also engaged if the verdict reached is illogical or irrational: R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 at para 26, [2013] 2 SCR 180 [WH]; R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para [50] Mr. Lugela suggests the trial judge’s reasoning was based on fundamental flaws that relate to the assessment of evidence from variou......
  • R v Tokaryk, 2019 ABCA 439
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Noviembre 2019
    ...85 OAC 186 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1996] SCCA No 347. [20] In R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13 and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, this Court endorsed a three-part test for appellate intervention due to incompetency of counsel. The appellant must establish: 1. ......
  • R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...(3d) 391. Both are part of a line of cases also including R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13, [2018] AJ No 448 (QL) and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, [2018] AJ No 1432 (QL). Those cases set out the three-part burden on an appellant who claims ineffective representation at a crimi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • R v Profeit,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 23 Noviembre 2021
    ...27; R v CKK, 2020 ABCA 145 at para 14, 386 CCC (3d) 391; R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13, [2018] AJ No 448 (QL) and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, [2018] AJ No 1432 (QL). [84]        Sauverwald noted (also in the context of assessing whether t......
  • R v Lugela, 2020 ABCA 348
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 30 Septiembre 2020
    ...is also engaged if the verdict reached is illogical or irrational: R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 at para 26, [2013] 2 SCR 180 [WH]; R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para [50] Mr. Lugela suggests the trial judge’s reasoning was based on fundamental flaws that relate to the assessment of evidence from variou......
  • R v Tokaryk, 2019 ABCA 439
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Noviembre 2019
    ...85 OAC 186 (Ont CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1996] SCCA No 347. [20] In R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13 and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, this Court endorsed a three-part test for appellate intervention due to incompetency of counsel. The appellant must establish: 1. ......
  • R v Sauverwald, 2020 ABCA 388
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Noviembre 2020
    ...(3d) 391. Both are part of a line of cases also including R v MacDonald, 2018 ABCA 138 at para 13, [2018] AJ No 448 (QL) and R v Shaw, 2018 ABCA 407 at para 12, [2018] AJ No 1432 (QL). Those cases set out the three-part burden on an appellant who claims ineffective representation at a crimi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT