R. v. Shingoose, 2019 SKQB 308
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | LAYH J. |
| Citation | 2019 SKQB 308 |
| Docket Number | CRM 42 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 28 November 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Thomson, 2020 SKPC 39
...this self-contained provision is distinct from the requirements of the ‘plain view’ common law doctrine. Justice Layh in R v Shingoose, 2019 SKQB 308 recently reviewed cases interpreting s. 489(2) of the Criminal Code: [71] Section 489(2) is legislation of relatively recent vintage, enacted......
-
R v Shingoose, 2020 SKCA 45
...possibilities as far-fetched. Thus, on my review of what is available to me, which includes only the voir dire decision, R v Shingoose, 2019 SKQB 308, and the Trial Decision, I do not share Mr. Shingoose’s view as to the strength of his case. [42] Having said that, I do not share Crown coun......
2 cases
-
R. v. Thomson, 2020 SKPC 39
...this self-contained provision is distinct from the requirements of the ‘plain view’ common law doctrine. Justice Layh in R v Shingoose, 2019 SKQB 308 recently reviewed cases interpreting s. 489(2) of the Criminal Code: [71] Section 489(2) is legislation of relatively recent vintage, enacted......
-
R v Shingoose, 2020 SKCA 45
...possibilities as far-fetched. Thus, on my review of what is available to me, which includes only the voir dire decision, R v Shingoose, 2019 SKQB 308, and the Trial Decision, I do not share Mr. Shingoose’s view as to the strength of his case. [42] Having said that, I do not share Crown coun......