R. v. Shropshire

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeLamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.
Citation[1995] 4 SCR 227,JE 95-2139,[1995] SCJ No 52 (QL),1995 CanLII 47 (SCC),102 CCC (3d) 193,[1995] CarswellBC 906,106 WAC 37,65 BCAC 37,188 NR 284,43 CR (4th) 269,129 DLR (4th) 657,[1995] ACS no 52,28 WCB (2d) 516
Date16 November 1995
Docket Number24227

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1798 practice notes
  • R. v. Parranto
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295; R. v. Sandercock (1985), 40 Alta. L.R. (2d) 265; R. v. Smith, 2019 SKCA 100, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 455; R. v. Br......
  • R. v. D.R., H.R. and D.W., (1996) 144 Sask.R. 81 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 1996
    ...to. [para. 100]. R. v. Barrett (D.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 752; 179 N.R. 68; 80 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 100]. R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37, refd to. [para. R. v. McMaster (R.A.) et al., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 740; 194 N.R. 278; 181 A.R. 199;......
  • R. v. Scott (J.J.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 27, 2013
    ...Proulx , 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61, at paras. 123-26; R. v. McDonnell , [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948, at paras. 14-17; R. v. Shropshire , [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227). As Laskin J.A. explained in R. v. McKnight (1999), 135 C.C.C. (3d) 41 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 35, however, this does not mean that appell......
  • Black v. R
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • October 26, 2009
    ...1619, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Cormier (R.A.) (2005), 392 A.R. 246; 2005 ABQB 801, refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37, refd to. [para. 52]. R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.......
  • Get Started for Free
1664 cases
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295; R. v. Sandercock (1985), 40 Alta. L.R. (2d) 265; R. v. Smith, 2019 SKCA 100, 382 C.C.C. (3d) 455; R. v. Br......
  • R. v. J.L.M.A.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 6, 2009
    ...R. v. Gardiner, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 368 ; 43 N.R. 361 ; 68 C.C.C.(2d) 477 , refd to. [para. 73, footnote 103]. R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284 ; 65 B.C.A.C. 37 ; 106 W.A.C. 37 ; 102 C.C.C.(3d) 193 ; 129 D.L.R.(4th) 657 , refd to. [paras. 74, 312, footnote R. v......
  • R. v. D.R., H.R. and D.W., (1996) 144 Sask.R. 81 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 1996
    ...to. [para. 100]. R. v. Barrett (D.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 752; 179 N.R. 68; 80 O.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 100]. R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37, refd to. [para. R. v. McMaster (R.A.) et al., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 740; 194 N.R. 278; 181 A.R. 199;......
  • R. v. Scott (J.J.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 27, 2013
    ...Proulx , 2000 SCC 5, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61, at paras. 123-26; R. v. McDonnell , [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948, at paras. 14-17; R. v. Shropshire , [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227). As Laskin J.A. explained in R. v. McKnight (1999), 135 C.C.C. (3d) 41 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 35, however, this does not mean that appell......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 – February 14, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 8, 2020
    ...R. v. Atikian (1990), 1 O.R. (3d) 263 (C.A.), R. v. G.H., 2020 ONCA 1, R. v. Bevan, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599, Sentencing, R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227, R. v. Salah, 2015 ONCA 23, R. v. Stiers, 2010 ONCA 656, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 150 R. v. AE, 2020 ONCA 117 Keywor......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 12, 2020
    ...et al. v. National Energy Board et al., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, Groia v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 27, R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227 R. v. J., 2020 ONCA 280 Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Bail, COVID-19, Criminal Code, s. 679(3)(c), R. v. Oland, 2017 SCC 17, R. v. ......
147 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Youth Criminal Justice Law. Second Edition
    • September 2, 2009
    ...436 R. v. Shoker, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 399, 41 C.R. (6th) 1, [2006] S.C.J. No. 44 ............ 534 R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227, 129 D.L.R. (4th) 657, [1995] S.C.J. No. 52 ........................................................................................... 670– 71 R. v. Simpson (......
  • Person(s) of interest and missing women: legal abandonment in the Downtown Eastside.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 60 No. 1, September - September 2014
    • September 1, 2014
    ...at 233-34). (69) R v Pickton, 2006 BCSC 1601, supra note 38 at para 21. Wendy Crawford was one of the twenty other women that Pickton was charged with murdering. These twenty charges were severed from the Pickton trial. The Crown introduced evidence of Wendy Crawford's remains as similar fact evi......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Law. Fourth Edition
    • September 2, 2009
    ...893, 45 C.C.C. (3d) 289, 67 C.R. (3d) 61, [1989] 1 W.W.R. 635, 90 N.R. 262 ...................................... 41 R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227, 102 C.C.C. (3d) 193, 43 C.R. (4th) 269, 129 D.L.R. (4th) 657, 65 B.C.A.C. 37, 106 W.A.C. 37, 188 N.R. 284 ...................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Law. Sixth Edition
    • August 30, 2015
    ...67 C.R. (3d) 61 .............................................................................................. 44 R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227, 102 C.C.C. (3d) 193, 43 C.R. (4th) 269 ......................................................................................... 479 R. v.......
  • Get Started for Free
1 provisions
  • Endangered Species Act, 2007, S.O. 2007, c. 6 0
    • Canada
    • Ontario Acts
    • Invalid date
    ...(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a species for which the preparation of a recovery strategy or management plan is required under section 37 or 65 of the Species at Risk Act (Canada). 2007, c. 6, s. 12 Time limit (3) The Minister shall ensure that a management plan prepared under subsect......