R v Sidhu
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Crighton,Feehan,Wakeling |
| Citation | 2022 ABCA 66 |
| Date | 01 January 2022 |
| Docket Number | 2003-0170A |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
R. v. Nahanee
...536; Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 643; R. v. McDonald, 2018 ONCA 369, 360 C.C.C. (3d) 494; R. v. Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, 411 C.C.C. (3d) 329; R. v. Mohiadin, 2021 ONCA 122; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869. By Karakatsanis J. (dissenting) R. v. Anth......
-
R. v. Wesley
...for a guilty plea: e.g., R. v. Dunkers, 2018 BCCA 363, at paras. 42 and 44; R. v. Frampton, 2018 NLCA 23, at para. 28; and R. v. Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, 411 C.C.C. (3d) 329, at para. [87] Based on the foregoing reasons, I conclude that the joint recommendation on sentence made following the tr......
-
R v Sheppard
...He said Mr Sheppard’s behaviour fell at the high end of that range before reductions for restraints and totality. [35] In R v Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, paras 79-82, 411 CCC (3d) 329, this Court said that a fit sentence would have been three years, given the duration and sophistication of the cri......
-
Xiao-Phillips v. Law Society of Saskatchewan
...after there has been a contested hearing on the merits. (See, for example, R v Frampton, 2018 NLCA 23 at para 28; R v Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66 at para 32, 411 CCC (3d) 329; R v Dunkers, 2018 BCCA 363 at para 44). As summarized by one commentator, where the parties’ joint sentencing position deve......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
R. v. Nahanee
...536; Cardinal v. Director of Kent Institution, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 643; R. v. McDonald, 2018 ONCA 369, 360 C.C.C. (3d) 494; R. v. Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, 411 C.C.C. (3d) 329; R. v. Mohiadin, 2021 ONCA 122; R. v. Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869. By Karakatsanis J. (dissenting) R. v. Anth......
-
R. v. Wesley
...for a guilty plea: e.g., R. v. Dunkers, 2018 BCCA 363, at paras. 42 and 44; R. v. Frampton, 2018 NLCA 23, at para. 28; and R. v. Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, 411 C.C.C. (3d) 329, at para. [87] Based on the foregoing reasons, I conclude that the joint recommendation on sentence made following the tr......
-
R v Sheppard
...He said Mr Sheppard’s behaviour fell at the high end of that range before reductions for restraints and totality. [35] In R v Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66, paras 79-82, 411 CCC (3d) 329, this Court said that a fit sentence would have been three years, given the duration and sophistication of the cri......
-
Xiao-Phillips v. Law Society of Saskatchewan
...after there has been a contested hearing on the merits. (See, for example, R v Frampton, 2018 NLCA 23 at para 28; R v Sidhu, 2022 ABCA 66 at para 32, 411 CCC (3d) 329; R v Dunkers, 2018 BCCA 363 at para 44). As summarized by one commentator, where the parties’ joint sentencing position deve......
Get Started for Free
