R v Singh et al, 2020 MBCA 61

JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeMadam Justice Holly C. Beard,Mr. Justice Marc M. Monnin,Mr. Justice William J. Burnett
Citation2020 MBCA 61
Docket NumberAR18-30-09073
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
Date11 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Figg v. R,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...to subject the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown. See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31-33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. 40-41; R. ......
  • Mountainstar Gold Inc. v. British Columbia Securities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 7, 2022
    ...the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown.  See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31–33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 40......
  • R. v. M.R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 23, 2021
    ...the issue of the D.N.A. evidence, having regard to all of the evidence adduced at trial as he was required to do: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61, at para. [23]       In his reasons, the trial judge was at pains to avoid an inference of guilt based on a findin......
  • R. v. M.P.H.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 21, 2022
    ...subject the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown.  See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31–33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Figg v. R,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • June 30, 2022
    ...to subject the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown. See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31-33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. 40-41; R. ......
  • Mountainstar Gold Inc. v. British Columbia Securities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 7, 2022
    ...the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown.  See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31–33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 40......
  • R. v. M.R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 23, 2021
    ...the issue of the D.N.A. evidence, having regard to all of the evidence adduced at trial as he was required to do: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61, at para. [23]       In his reasons, the trial judge was at pains to avoid an inference of guilt based on a findin......
  • R. v. M.P.H.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 21, 2022
    ...subject the evidence of the defence to more rigorous scrutiny than the evidence of the Crown.  See, for example: R. v. Singh et al., 2020 MBCA 61 at paras. 31–33; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37 at para. 29; R. v. Murray, 2020 BCCA 42 at para. 82; R. v. E.H., 2020 ONCA 405 at paras. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT