R v SJB
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Marc M. Monnin,Mr. Justice William J. Burnett,Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella |
| Citation | 2018 MBCA 62 |
| Date | 22 May 2018 |
| Docket Number | AR17-30-08921 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
...28. 46 R v DD, 2018 ONCA 134 at para 16. 47 R v DN, 2018 BCCA 190. 48 R v ECVN, 2018 ONCA 149. 49 R v Martial, 2018 ABCA 201. 50 R v SJB, 2018 MBCA 62. 51 Lemay, supra note 44 at para 35. Copyright © 2024 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Aggravating and Mitigati......
-
Sentencing Charts
...of trust” (para 8); multiple acts over extended period of time or with heightened intrusiveness demand more severe sentences R v SJB , 2018 MBCA 62 3 years’ incarceration Sentence increased on appeal from 18 months’ incarceration and 3 years’ probation imposed at trial Convicted for sex......
-
Table of Cases
...608 Sipos , R v , 2014 SCC 47 ............................................................ 498-501 SJB , R v , 2018 MBCA 62 ......................................................... 120, 535 SJL , R v , 2009 SCC 14 ............................................................... 382 SK , R v......
-
R. v. Scofield
...a sentence from what is otherwise appropriate. This proposition is illustrated by the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62: [20] The sentencing judge cannot, however, use the absence of an aggravating factor as mitigating or the absence of a mitigating factor as a......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
R. v. Bertrand Marchand
...R. v. Laberge (1995), 165 A.R. 375; R. v. S.R., 2008 QCCA 2359; R. v. Barrett, 2013 QCCA 1351; R. v. D.B., 2013 QCCA 2199; R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62; R. v. Audet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 171; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; Ross v. New Brunswic......
-
R. v. Scofield
...a sentence from what is otherwise appropriate. This proposition is illustrated by the Manitoba Court of Appeal decision in R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62: [20] The sentencing judge cannot, however, use the absence of an aggravating factor as mitigating or the absence of a mitigating factor as a......
-
R v SADF
...the physical harm such offences cause is often transitory, the psychological harm is typically permanent and significant (see R v SJB, 2018 MBCA 62 at para [30] Recently in Friesen, the Supreme Court of Canada provided important guidance concerning the sentencing considerations for sexual o......
-
R v Sangha
...reduce a sentence on the basis of such an absence is an error in principle: R. v. Scofield, 2019 BCCA 3 at para. 36, citing R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62. i. Aggravating Circumstances 77 The Crown must prove facts that constitute an aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt: s. 724(3)......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
...28. 46 R v DD, 2018 ONCA 134 at para 16. 47 R v DN, 2018 BCCA 190. 48 R v ECVN, 2018 ONCA 149. 49 R v Martial, 2018 ABCA 201. 50 R v SJB, 2018 MBCA 62. 51 Lemay, supra note 44 at para 35. Copyright © 2024 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 4 Aggravating and Mitigati......
-
Sentencing Charts
...of trust” (para 8); multiple acts over extended period of time or with heightened intrusiveness demand more severe sentences R v SJB , 2018 MBCA 62 3 years’ incarceration Sentence increased on appeal from 18 months’ incarceration and 3 years’ probation imposed at trial Convicted for sex......
-
Table of Cases
...608 Sipos , R v , 2014 SCC 47 ............................................................ 498-501 SJB , R v , 2018 MBCA 62 ......................................................... 120, 535 SJL , R v , 2009 SCC 14 ............................................................... 382 SK , R v......
