R. v. Slatter

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeTrotter J.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 807
Date08 October 2019
Docket NumberC65248

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
55 practice notes
  • R. v. T.J.F.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...for sufficiency, an appellate court should start from a stance of deference towards a trial judge’s perception of the facts”; Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, para. 118. They also remind us a trial judge’s reasons with respect to credibility do not need to “describe every consideration”, Slatter (20......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-6)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 10, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 33, R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, R. v. A.M., 2014 ONCA 769, R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, R. v. Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, R. v. Sanichar, 2012 ONCA 117, R. v. N.K., 2021 ONCA 13, R. v. A.K., 2018 ONCA 567, Benhaim v. St-Germain, 2016 SCC 48, Hacopian-Armen Estate ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-6)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 10, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 33, R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, R. v. A.M., 2014 ONCA 769, R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, R. v. Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, R. v. Sanichar, 2012 ONCA 117, R. v. N.K., 2021 ONCA 13, R. v. A.K., 2018 ONCA 567, Benhaim v. St-Germain, 2016 SCC 48, Hacopian-Armen Estate ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    ...326, 338, 517 Slatter , R v , 2018 ONCA 962 ........................................................... . 219 Slatter , R v , 2019 ONCA 807 ........................................................... . 204 SM , R v , 1995 ABCA 198 ..................................................................
  • Get Started for Free
41 cases
  • R. v. T.J.F.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 25, 2023
    ...for sufficiency, an appellate court should start from a stance of deference towards a trial judge’s perception of the facts”; Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, para. 118. They also remind us a trial judge’s reasons with respect to credibility do not need to “describe every consideration”, Slatter (20......
  • R v Profeit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 23, 2021
    ...cases: R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, 451 DLR (4th) 426, reversing 2019 SKCA 127, 382 CCC (3d) 560, and R v Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, reversing 2019 ONCA 807, 148 OR (3d) 81. The Supreme Court in F(G) said at para As Slatter demonstrates, a trial judge’s findings of credibility deserve particular......
  • R. v. Steed
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 6, 2020
    ...that the facts of the March 29 search would also be included in the second ITO. [11] See R v Perrone, 2015 SCC 8 and R v. Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807 at para. [12] The relevant test is succinctly stated in R v Wallace, 2016 NSCA 79 per Beveridge, JA at paras. 25-30. “Importantly, the ITO need no......
  • R. v. D.E.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 25, 2022
    ...36, 452 DLR (4th) 1, where the Supreme Court of Canada reversed the split decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, cited at R v Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, 452 DLR (4th) 4 [Slatter]. While the complainant in that case was not a child, she had intellectual disabilities and was regarded as a vuln......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-6)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 10, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 33, R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, R. v. A.M., 2014 ONCA 769, R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, R. v. Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, R. v. Sanichar, 2012 ONCA 117, R. v. N.K., 2021 ONCA 13, R. v. A.K., 2018 ONCA 567, Benhaim v. St-Germain, 2016 SCC 48, Hacopian-Armen Estate ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-6)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 10, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 33, R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, R. v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, R. v. A.M., 2014 ONCA 769, R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, R. v. Slatter, 2019 ONCA 807, R. v. Sanichar, 2012 ONCA 117, R. v. N.K., 2021 ONCA 13, R. v. A.K., 2018 ONCA 567, Benhaim v. St-Germain, 2016 SCC 48, Hacopian-Armen Estate ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 7 – October 11 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 24, 2019
    ...Cleghorn, [1995] 3 SCR 175, R. v Noble, [1997] 1 SCR 874, R. v Hogan (1982), 2 CCC (3d) 557 (Ont. CA), R. v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17 R. v. S., 2019 ONCA 807 Keywords:Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, R. v Dinardo, 2008 SCC 24, R. v Vuradin, 2013 SCC 38, R. v Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17 R. v. M.G., 2019 ONCA......
10 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    ...326, 338, 517 Slatter , R v , 2018 ONCA 962 ........................................................... . 219 Slatter , R v , 2019 ONCA 807 ........................................................... . 204 SM , R v , 1995 ABCA 198 ..................................................................
  • Evidentiary Issues
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • June 7, 2024
    ...480, 65 WCB (2d) 41 at para 44 (CA). 247 See R v Morrissey (1995), 22 OR (3d) 514, 97 CCC (3d) 193 at paras 33-35 (CA) ; R v Slatter , 2019 ONCA 807 at para 60; R v HC , 2009 ONCA 56 at para 41. 248 David Watt, Watt’s Manual of Criminal Jury Instructions , 2nd ed (Toronto: Carswell, 2015), ......
  • Reliability as a Factor of Credibility
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Witness Preparation, Presentation and Assessment Part III
    • May 3, 2023
    ...R v Thomas , 2012 ONSC 6653 at para 13. 2 R v Smith; R v James , 2007 NSCA 19 at para 172. 3 Pepall JA (dissenting) in R v Slatter , 2019 ONCA 807 at para 119. The Supreme Court of Canada adopted the reasons of Pepall J in overturning the majority decision. 4 R v Slatter , 2020 SCC 36 ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Witness Preparation, Presentation and Assessment Part III
    • May 3, 2023
    ...102-3 SL , R v , 2020 ONSC 4036 ..................................................... 93 Slatter , R v , 2019 ONCA 807 ............................................242, 250-51 Slatter , R v , 2020 SCC 36, rev’g 2019 ONCA 807 ................ 235, 242, 245-46, 250-51 SLC , R v , 2020 ABQB 515......
  • Get Started for Free