R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Citation | 2020 SCC 36 |
| Docket Number | 38870 |
| Date | 06 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 practice notes
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...Supreme Court of Canada released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
...0808 Keywords: Torts, Negligence, Duty of Care, Foreseeability, Garnishment, Abuse of Process, 168872 Ont. Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2020 SCC 36, Cooper v. Hobart, 2001 SCC 79, Rankin v. J.J., 2018 SCC 19 Ontario Securities Commission v Money Gate Mortgage Investment Corporation, 2020 ......
-
R v Profeit,
...verdicts in two recent cases: R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, 451 DLR (4th) 426, reversing 2019 SKCA 127, 382 CCC (3d) 560, and R v Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, reversing 2019 ONCA 807, 148 OR (3d) 81. The Supreme Court in F(G) said at para As Slatter demonstrates, a trial judge’s findings of ......
-
Figg v. R,
...In R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, [2020] S.C.J. No. 36 (QL), a sexual assault case where the complainant suffered from an intellectual or developmental disability, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial in a case where the trial judge relied heavily on the expert witness ......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
R. v. T.J.F.,
...Supreme Court of Canada released several brief oral decisions (R. v. Langan, 2020 SCC 33; R. v. Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34; R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36; R. v. Delmas, 2020 SCC 39; R. v. Mehari, 2020 SCC 40, R. v. W.M., 2020 SCC 42 and R. v. Cortes Rivera, 2020 SCC 44) reminding appeal courts of......
-
R v Profeit,
...verdicts in two recent cases: R v Kishayinew, 2020 SCC 34, 451 DLR (4th) 426, reversing 2019 SKCA 127, 382 CCC (3d) 560, and R v Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, reversing 2019 ONCA 807, 148 OR (3d) 81. The Supreme Court in F(G) said at para As Slatter demonstrates, a trial judge’s findings of ......
-
Figg v. R,
...In R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, [2020] S.C.J. No. 36 (QL), a sexual assault case where the complainant suffered from an intellectual or developmental disability, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal and ordered a new trial in a case where the trial judge relied heavily on the expert witness ......
-
R v Mela,
...see R v P(R), 2012 SCC 22 at paras 9-10, [2012] 1 SCR 746; B(MJ) at para 20; R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, [2016] 1 SCR 1000; R v Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, [2020] SCJ No 36 (QL). Depending on the nature and depth of impact of actual unreasonableness of the verdict if found, either a direction fo......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
...0808 Keywords: Torts, Negligence, Duty of Care, Foreseeability, Garnishment, Abuse of Process, 168872 Ont. Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2020 SCC 36, Cooper v. Hobart, 2001 SCC 79, Rankin v. J.J., 2018 SCC 19 Ontario Securities Commission v Money Gate Mortgage Investment Corporation, 2020 ......
-
What Regulators Can Learn From The Criminal Courts About Sexual Abuse Cases
...an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Footnotes 1 Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18. 2 R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36. 3 Slatter, at para. 4 R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9. 5 Friesen, at para. 147. 6 Friesen, at para. 146 [citations omitted]. 7 R. v. Visscher, 2012 ......
1 books & journal articles
-
SCC Rules on Intellectual Disabilities and Equality.
...recent Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) case, R v Slatter, 2020 SCC 36, provided a strong statement about the treatment of evidence provided by witnesses who have intellectual or developmental Thomas Slatter was convicted at trial of sexually assaulting an intellectually disabled 21-year-old w......