R. v. Smith, 2021 SCC 16
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Kasirer, Nicholas |
Date | 22 April 2021 |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Docket Number | 39401 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 practice notes
-
R v Settle,
...with Ms. Doonanco’s ability to know the case she had to meet and make full answer and defence.”; · More recently yet there is R v Smith, 2021 SCC 16, [2021] SCJ No 14 (QL) where Brown J in discussing alleged misapprehension of evidence under Morrissey wrote: 2 Determining whether a misappre......
-
R v Profeit,
...and impartial jury, no prejudice, and no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. [Emphasis added] Similarly, in R v Smith, 2021 SCC 16 at para 2, 456 DLR (4th) 549, Brown J for the Court said that even if the trial judge did not consider prior statements in assessing the complainant......
-
R. v. White,
...R. v. Graveline, 2006 SCC 16, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Khan, 2001 SCC 86, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 823; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2; R. v. Smith, 2021 SCC 16; R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 SCC 9; R. v. Stark, 2017 ONCA 148; R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76; R. v. O’Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 STATUTES CONS......
-
R. v. Noseworthy,
...No. 203; R. v. Barnes, 2021 NLCA 15; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22; R. v. MacIsaac, 2013 NLCA 26; R. v. Smith, 2020 BCCA 271, rev’d 2021 SCC 16; R. v. M. (R.E.), 2008 SCC 51; R. v. Cinous, 2002 SCC 29; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33; R. v. Butler, 2019 NLCA 21; R. v. McGrath, 2009 NLTD 45; ......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
R v Settle,
...with Ms. Doonanco’s ability to know the case she had to meet and make full answer and defence.”; · More recently yet there is R v Smith, 2021 SCC 16, [2021] SCJ No 14 (QL) where Brown J in discussing alleged misapprehension of evidence under Morrissey wrote: 2 Determining whether a misappre......
-
R v Profeit,
...and impartial jury, no prejudice, and no substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice. [Emphasis added] Similarly, in R v Smith, 2021 SCC 16 at para 2, 456 DLR (4th) 549, Brown J for the Court said that even if the trial judge did not consider prior statements in assessing the complainant......
-
R. v. White,
...R. v. Graveline, 2006 SCC 16, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 609; R. v. Khan, 2001 SCC 86, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 823; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2; R. v. Smith, 2021 SCC 16; R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 SCC 9; R. v. Stark, 2017 ONCA 148; R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76; R. v. O’Connor, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 STATUTES CONS......
-
R. v. Noseworthy,
...No. 203; R. v. Barnes, 2021 NLCA 15; R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22; R. v. MacIsaac, 2013 NLCA 26; R. v. Smith, 2020 BCCA 271, rev’d 2021 SCC 16; R. v. M. (R.E.), 2008 SCC 51; R. v. Cinous, 2002 SCC 29; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33; R. v. Butler, 2019 NLCA 21; R. v. McGrath, 2009 NLTD 45; ......
Request a trial to view additional results