R. v. Smithen-Davis,

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeSimmons, Watt and Miller JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2020 ONCA 759
Citation2020 ONCA 759
Date01 December 2020
Docket NumberM51636 (C65661)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Adams, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 707; R. v. Smithen‑Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, 68 C.R. (7th) 75; Paper Machinery Ltd. v. J.O. Ross Engineering Corp., [1934] S.C.R. 186; R. v. H. (E.) (1997), 33 O.R. (3d) 202; The Que......
  • R. v. J.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 18, 2021
    ...[1950], S.C.R 412, at page 428; R. v. Morgentaler, Smoling and Scott (1984), 16 CCC (3d) 1 (Ont. CA), at pages 5-6; R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, at paras. 27-28. Where no right of appeal is given, none exists. [21]       Section 684 contains no provision......
  • R. v. Carignan, 2021 ONCA 899
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...demonstrate “a real concern” that a miscarriage of justice will occur unless the appeal is re-opened: R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759. [4]           The appellant appeared on the motion to re-open his appeal in person. He ma......
  • R. v. Haile,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 16, 2021
    ...been drafted and signed.  In these circumstances, it is doubtful that the doctrine of functus officio applied: R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, 68 C.R. (7th) 75, at paras. of the Peace erred in concluding that he was functus officio.  However, the exchange between the Justice o......
4 cases
  • Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. Manitoba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 24, 2021
    ...v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Adams, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 707; R. v. Smithen‑Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, 68 C.R. (7th) 75; Paper Machinery Ltd. v. J.O. Ross Engineering Corp., [1934] S.C.R. 186; R. v. H. (E.) (1997), 33 O.R. (3d) 202; The Que......
  • R. v. J.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 18, 2021
    ...[1950], S.C.R 412, at page 428; R. v. Morgentaler, Smoling and Scott (1984), 16 CCC (3d) 1 (Ont. CA), at pages 5-6; R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, at paras. 27-28. Where no right of appeal is given, none exists. [21]       Section 684 contains no provision......
  • R. v. Carignan, 2021 ONCA 899
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 17, 2021
    ...demonstrate “a real concern” that a miscarriage of justice will occur unless the appeal is re-opened: R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759. [4]           The appellant appeared on the motion to re-open his appeal in person. He ma......
  • R. v. Haile,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 16, 2021
    ...been drafted and signed.  In these circumstances, it is doubtful that the doctrine of functus officio applied: R. v. Smithen-Davis, 2020 ONCA 759, 68 C.R. (7th) 75, at paras. of the Peace erred in concluding that he was functus officio.  However, the exchange between the Justice o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT