R. v. Sotomayor (A.)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Trotter, J. |
| Citation | [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 500 (SC),[2014] O.T.C. Uned. 500,2014 ONSC 500 |
| Date | 22 January 2014 |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...679(3)(c), R. v. Oland, 2017 SCC 17, R. v. Morales, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 711, R. v. Fleming, [2015] O.J. No. 4380 (S.C.J.), R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, R. v. Omitiran, 2020 ONCA 261, R. v. Kazman, 2020 ONCA 251 R. v. S., 2020 ONCA 285 Keywords: Criminal Law, Attempted Murder, Discharging a F......
-
The Attorney General of Canada v Kimbrough
...3 at para. 102. 10 Pannell, at para. 40. See also United States of America v. Singh, 2014 ONCA 559, at para. 17, citing R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, per Trotter 11 R. v. T.L., 2020 ONSC 1885, at para. 22, quoted in R. v. Shahid, at para. 43. , [2020] 2 S.C.R. 3 at para. 102. 10 Pannell......
-
R. v. Hassan
...what he was doing. These limitations have been acknowledged by the courts: R. v. Palijan, [2012] O.J. No. 6549 (S.C.); R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at paras. 40-41; R. v. Ma, 2015 ONSC 7709, at para. 56; R. v. Osman, 2020 ONSC 965, at paras. [33] The Recovery Science Corporation, the com......
-
United States of America v. Singh
...  However, as Justice Trotter rightly noted, "Electronic monitoring is not a primary ground panacea.": R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at para. 40; see also R. v. Dang, 2015 ONSC 4254, 21 C.R. (7th) 85, at para. 42. That is because someone determined to flee can remove the an......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R. v. Hassan
...what he was doing. These limitations have been acknowledged by the courts: R. v. Palijan, [2012] O.J. No. 6549 (S.C.); R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at paras. 40-41; R. v. Ma, 2015 ONSC 7709, at para. 56; R. v. Osman, 2020 ONSC 965, at paras. [33] The Recovery Science Corporation, the com......
-
United States of America v. Singh
...  However, as Justice Trotter rightly noted, "Electronic monitoring is not a primary ground panacea.": R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at para. 40; see also R. v. Dang, 2015 ONSC 4254, 21 C.R. (7th) 85, at para. 42. That is because someone determined to flee can remove the an......
-
R. v. Zamora-Doxtator
...enter into a GPS monitoring program with a company such as RCS will depend on the specific circumstances of a case: R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at para. 41, fn. 1. In the present case, I am not persuaded that the proposed GPS monitoring program significantly reduces the likelihood ......
-
R. v. Johnson
...what they are doing. Other decisions reflect this weakness: R. v. Palijan, [2012] O.J. No. 6549 (S.C.), at paras. 24-27; R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, at paras. 40-41; R. v. Ma, 2015 ONSC 7709, at para. 56; R. v. Osman, 2020 ONSC 965, at paras. [23]      
......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...679(3)(c), R. v. Oland, 2017 SCC 17, R. v. Morales, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 711, R. v. Fleming, [2015] O.J. No. 4380 (S.C.J.), R. v. Sotomayor, 2014 ONSC 500, R. v. Omitiran, 2020 ONCA 261, R. v. Kazman, 2020 ONCA 251 R. v. S., 2020 ONCA 285 Keywords: Criminal Law, Attempted Murder, Discharging a F......